trinsic2

34 ms·

781.
by trinsic2 2y ago
I think society has made it convenient for people to lend their creativity to someone else's vision. I don't think its a good idea for talented people to work for corporations that have no connection to the public good. I don&#x27
782.
by trinsic2 2y ago
I think complexity slowly developed over time to address certain needs of the time. Partly because software has been needing to do more. People and institution have become completely dependent on ease-of-use. When that happens software need
783.
by trinsic2 2y ago
Why would he bring his phone though?
784.
by trinsic2 2y ago
I'm pretty sure he said that in the article.
785.
by trinsic2 2y ago
This is why I left windows recently[0]. When you design an OS that doesn't respect the user's choices, you are no longer in control of the OS. Windows 11 shifted to trying to force people to use Edge. You can't even change th
786.
by trinsic2 2y ago
I wonder if the actual wisdom gets buried under the multitude of biased and unintelligent responses though.
787.
by trinsic2 2y ago
That's a good point. But whats the end-game of all this. Just to profit of new technologies?
788.
by trinsic2 2y ago
Exactly. Governments cant, or wont, put bad actors employed by corporations behind bars before we had AI. They treat corporations like one large entity that cant be acted upon when in reality corporations are run by people, good and bad.
789.
by trinsic2 2y ago
When money becomes a byproduct of what you value, that will change your outlook.
790.
by trinsic2 2y ago
I hate to say this, but the OP is right. Nothing will change until we stop supporting the problem. I think the best course of action is to stop supporting corporate culture. People really do need to stop working for all corporations. We nee
791.
by trinsic2 2y ago
Ugh Teams = Microsoft. They are the worst when it comes to data privacy. I'm not sure how that is even a choice.
792.
by trinsic2 2y ago
> Of course, if you value the privacy of these data a lot, and if you believe that by allowing them to train on them it is actually going to risk exposing private info, the story changes. But then you have an option to say stop. It'
793.
by trinsic2 2y ago
This is the biggest solution to the problem that many people seem to ignore. If you want your communities to prosper, then the public needs to own the infrastructure that companies provide services for. Full stop. Anything less is giving co
794.
by trinsic2 2y ago
Yeah, I see some good points in what you just said. I see certain ideologies like patriotism, seem to isolate us into camps, and then people that desire power through these ideals, use those constructs to control populations in each of the
795.
by trinsic2 2y ago
I could be reacting from my bias towards individuals, self expression with this response. I'm not seeing this is a problem of individual self expression. At least in the way it's described in this article, which I understand is to
796.
by trinsic2 3y ago
The Postmaster debacle is the biggest example of this I have ever seen. Something has dramatically changed when people are not being held accountable for their crimes.
797.
by trinsic2 3y ago
I'm actually reminded of the movie Children of Men, which seems much more of a realistic view of a dystopian landscape in UK over the next 20-50 years.
798.
by trinsic2 3y ago
That's how people in governments want it. Vulnerabilities in our infrastructure allow government entities to justify there existence. The population rely way too much on political institutions. People in positions of political power w
799.
by trinsic2 3y ago
So I'm not getting what would be the result from cases like this. IMHO the whole point of criminal law is to hold an actual person responsible for their behavior. Holding an organization responsible for a crime doesn't seem to hol
800.
by trinsic2 3y ago
Can anyone give me a example of of what this could be compared to in the world? As a non-programmar Im having trouble understanding what this is and how this is important, but the headline sounds interesting.
801.
by trinsic2 3y ago
In my experience, there are some security products out there that protect against browser redirects and software that can do shady things to the computer even though it appears legit. I think these products are good for basic users who don&
802.
by trinsic2 3y ago
I've always been concerned about security products redirecting it users to a bundled browser. >Avast's stupid response “While we disagree with the FTC’s allegations and characterization of the facts, we are pleased to resolve t
803.
by trinsic2 3y ago
I understand the Divide and Conquer part, but I am not understanding what the disempowerment is about. Can someone give me their interpretation of what AI-Driven Disempowerment means?
804.
by trinsic2 3y ago
Companies don't have freedom. People do. Companies are a collection of people that have a responsibility to the people who allow them to operating by charters. In our current age, I'd say that justice in this regard isn't ope
805.
by trinsic2 3y ago
I'd argue that's not the case. CEO's are accountable to share holders, not its customers. And before you say its the same thing, there are a lot of pubically traded companies who get away with unlawful actions that direct eff
806.
by trinsic2 3y ago
I'd rather trust a public (not-for-profit) institution that actually had a real incentive to protect user security. Instead we get for-profit companies that have a vested interest (conflict of interest) to do security the way it thinks
807.
by trinsic2 3y ago
Thanks. I'll check it out. Didn't even know there were radio stations for game music.
808.
by trinsic2 3y ago
I was thinking to some thing. But I can see how this would effect people now that everything is digital.
809.
by trinsic2 3y ago
I wouldn't say copying streams is trivially easy
810.
by trinsic2 3y ago
I'm surprised that these companies are not feeling the effects of the ill will that is caused by these kinds of decisions.

More ›