trinsic2

4 ms·

1.
by trinsic2 5d ago
Maybe I am missing the point of the article, but it seems to me that there's always an intender. Maybe the intender created something that doesnt have intent, but there is always someone behind the scenes that is creates the intent beh
2.
by trinsic2 7d ago
Whos property?
3.
Why People Are Sabotaging Flock Surveillance Cameras(nytimes.com)
4 points by trinsic2 7d ago|11 comments
4.
by trinsic2 7d ago
This is why I always have at lest two devices connected to 2fa and a UF2 Security Key
5.
by trinsic2 11d ago
This isnt romanticizing premodern world. Modern doesn't equal better, but I understand the knee jerk reaction to calling out the serious problems with our current society that nobody wants to face.
6.
by trinsic2 11d ago
Im kind of sad that tribes, who have never been exposed to the modern world, get exposed to the damaging effects of materialism. It reminds me of that film "The gods must be crazy" [0] [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org&#x2F
7.
by trinsic2 11d ago
I know it looks like an effort to deliberately fragment the narrative
8.
by trinsic2 12d ago
I disagree. Having a design doc would have saved me some time having to rewrite certain parts of a CRM system I am working on in Obsidian[0]. Not having a plan on handling certain aspects up from can make more work. [0]: https:/&#x2F
9.
by trinsic2 12d ago
Exactly. Just follow the patterns. Its pretty obvious.
10.
by trinsic2 12d ago
It will remain this way in slightly differnt shades of colors until there is a systemic change. IM sorry this isn't a one party problem. There are people across the isle that are allowing this to continue. Im not in support of any part
11.
by trinsic2 12d ago
There is no such thing as a Corporate person. Sounds like a something that was created by a legal system for people to absolve themselves of responsibility.
12.
by trinsic2 12d ago
Yes! AI companies can get by with anything now. They can just say its the AI that did it, not us... We are in some real shit right now. If we cant make individuals responsible for their creations..
13.
by trinsic2 13d ago
this whole idea that AI is intelligent really reminds me of flat earthers. Stupid people think stupid things while social media algorithms drive this stupidity, and people come to believe things that are insane.
14.
by trinsic2 13d ago
It wont be adopted because we unconciously need to avoid responsibility of showing up as responsible human beings. Hence western civilization will crash and burn unless we start rethinking the way we operate.
15.
by trinsic2 13d ago
Agreed. The whole pointing fingers bit is us wanting to distract ourselves from responsibility of either looking at how we enable the problem, or avoiding responsibility of taken action towards resolving it.
16.
by trinsic2 13d ago
Watch the GamersNexus video. Its all there.
17.
by trinsic2 13d ago
Yep this was my first gut reaction to this whole situation. But the difference for me is that society is allowing these corporations to act without strict rules on how they behave and this is a byproduct of a corrupt world. Nothing will cha
18.
by trinsic2 13d ago
Im not sure if you read up on the situation, but the current smart TV's surveillance functions are way beyond what anyone should have to deal with. They scan and connect to near Wifi devices to send data without consent There is commun
19.
by trinsic2 14d ago
I think it would be less time consuming to build one yourself.
20.
by trinsic2 14d ago
I think this is a great idea. I guess HN does think this scientific enough. ;)
21.
by trinsic2 16d ago
LOL Lets screenshot each others comments and comment on them.
22.
by trinsic2 17d ago
How do you know LG isn't giving/allowing/lookingtheotherway a 3rd party access to there API?
23.
by trinsic2 17d ago
The article reads more like a reverse psychology article directed at the public rather than a real criticism of mass surveillance. It's almost as if they want to convince their audience that the practice is justified. The article spend
24.
by trinsic2 18d ago
One of the things that bother me is that a lot of their language around the tracking technology is "We don't do x with it" But that doesnt rule out someone thats not affiliated with LG to use those features to perform various
25.
by trinsic2 20d ago
ROFLOL!!!
26.
by trinsic2 22d ago
That's exactly the way I framed the relationship between Microsoft and its victim in a companion article[0] I wrote in 2025 looking back on my switch to Linux. Since then I started realizing how parasitic the proprietary software indus
27.
by trinsic2 25d ago
Thanks. Interesting points. Not sure I quite understand it, but I will think it over.
28.
by trinsic2 25d ago
Ohh. But doesnt it push and control legislation? If it was just a standards body, couldn't countries governments just approve or deny recommendations at will? It seems like its operating as a government too me, but maybe I am not seein
29.
by trinsic2 25d ago
I was thinking about this article back in 2024[0]. What has changed, I wonder? [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40165998
30.
by trinsic2 25d ago
> Passkeys sync automatically across devices signed into the same Apple ID, Google account, or Microsoft account. Do you have to be in one of those ecosystems? because I am on neither.

More ›