So I'm not getting what would be the result from cases like this. IMHO the whole point of criminal law is to hold an actual person responsible for their behavio

So I'm not getting what would be the result from cases like this. IMHO the whole point of criminal law is to hold an actual person responsible for their behavior. Holding an organization responsible for a crime doesn't seem to hold any weight because the lives of the people responsible are not put on the line. If money is all that's involved, there is no human component in the accountability process. Will these cases change anything?