tomwill656

4 ms·

1.
by tomwill656 6y ago
They have hundreds of thousands of sex workers uploading and making ad revenue, and selling content, which they now won't be able to. They also announced a few days ago that uploads would only be for people in their model program and p
2.
by tomwill656 6y ago
No, I wonder why Mastercard does process charges on those platforms and what it means especially for Twitter and Reddit that allow UGC adult content. Here's an anecdote from Carrie Goldberg about how Pornhub compares to FB and Instagra
3.
by tomwill656 6y ago
They were using photoDNA and Youtube CSAI Match before the article. This is the same as what Reddit uses. I see it mentioned here back in March https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN21D3E9
4.
by tomwill656 6y ago
This article explains the originals of the NYT opinion article and the anti-sex work campaigns behind it: https://newrepublic.com/article/160488/nick-kristof-holy-war... Millions of VERY illegal child abuse are u
5.
by tomwill656 6y ago
They do as much as any UGC platform (auto scanning with photoDNA, reviewing, flags etc) and just committed to doing even more like forcing users to give ID to upload https://help.pornhub.com/hc/en-us/categories&#x2
6.
by tomwill656 6y ago
This is a huge victory for the religious anti-sex work movement. Some backstory to how this happened: https://newrepublic.com/article/160488/nick-kristof-holy-war... I suspect Mastercard will pull processing on ma
7.
by tomwill656 6y ago
The author of the op-ed mentions the Internet Watch Foundations's stat of 118 csam cases over 3 years on PornHub, and then says he asked them why it's so low dimisses their objective stats and says they couldn't explain. Mayb
8.
by tomwill656 6y ago
That op-ed is anti-porn though. The only source is Exodus Cry, an evangelical group trying to shut down the entire sex industry. The author briefly mentions the Internet Watch Foundation's objective stats and then dismisses it when the
9.
by tomwill656 6y ago
I think we need to invest more in investigating the criminals making and uploading the content. Millions and millions of child abuse material are reported to NCMEC but less than 2% are investigated. https://www.nytimes.com/
10.
by tomwill656 6y ago
Not sure if it's a dig against section 230, or just the sex industry. The journalist of this op-ed was instrumental in creating the moral panic to push through the SESTA legislation a few years ago. This legislation turned out to do no