thunky

26 ms·

541.
by thunky 2y ago
Fair enough
542.
by thunky 2y ago
> There was some person who invested "Invested" is a generous way to put it. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/basics/09/compare-inve...
543.
by thunky 2y ago
You're really grasping at straws now. I know what happened, and your link agrees with what I said. From your link: In Biden’s case, special counsel Robert Hur, a former U.S. attorney for Maryland nominated by Trump, concluded in a rep
544.
by thunky 2y ago
> Biden did not intentionally mishandle classified data Pretty easy to fact check yourself if you cared to: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/national... > This is pure nonsense. You'v
545.
by thunky 2y ago
This looks like a nice tool, but I agree with GP because as a reviewer I don't care about a "clean" commit history in a branch I'm reviewing. I care about what's changed, and imo the request description/annota
546.
by thunky 2y ago
I was using the same language GP used when they referred to Hunter Biden's mistake. That's my whole point here, is to try to be consistent regarless of who we're talking about.
547.
by thunky 2y ago
> You're misinformed on everything you mentioned. Trump was convicted in the "hush money" case. His classified documents case was thrown out by a federal judge who has questionable ethics and she was also appointed by Trum
548.
by thunky 2y ago
> That waters down the felony convictions and what they were related to. I don't think that's how it works. He wasn't charged with election interference or for violating campaign laws. But, given your take here, I assume
549.
by thunky 2y ago
> got charged for something that almost no one else does (filling out a gun form incorrectly) Do you also feel that Trump's 34 felony convictions for filling out a form incorrectly were standard treatment? Also considering that thi
550.
by thunky 2y ago
> But for large sophisticated apps where a mouse click might cause a state change that might update an unpredictable number of discreet individual visual changes throughout the entire page, that's where an SPA is needed In my experi
551.
by thunky 2y ago
It's easy for developers to forget who the "app" is actually for. Users don't care how it was implemented or how nice the code looks, they just want it to work.
552.
by thunky 2y ago
> Gratitude goes a long way. It sure does. And lack of gratitude goes a long way in the wrong direction. Big time demotivator.
553.
by thunky 2y ago
Is there no difference between a software "recall" and a software update? I'm imagining (uneducated guess) that the software is updated more often than it is recalled, and so a "recall" is an update that addresses a
554.
by thunky 2y ago
> you try really hard to make a point that ends up proven wrong I really don't think the argument for or against React has been settled. GP focused their mic drop on my example rather than the larger conversation, which missed the p
555.
by thunky 2y ago
> My standard lecture teaching developers how to interact with K8s takes almost precisely 30 minutes to have them writing Helm charts for themselves And I can teach someone to write "hello world" in 10 languages in 30 minutes,
556.
by thunky 2y ago
Oh no... Welp guess I'll have to take my business elsewhere. Thanks for the heads up. Now I'm off to find a golf site that uses React for guaranteed perfection.
557.
by thunky 2y ago
The forms/inputs are composable on the backend where the state is managed and the html is produced. Here's the most dynamic form I can think of: https://www.globalgolf.com/golf-clubs/1064148-titleist-tsr2-...
558.
by thunky 2y ago
I assume we're still talking about links, forms, and data tables . If the forms are so complex that we need React to manage them then it may be worth trying to simplify them a bit first. Or if the forms have to sync with the backend
559.
by thunky 2y ago
Can't that be done in one or two lines of jQuery?
560.
by thunky 2y ago
I think you and the sibling may have missed the requirements up thread: If you only need links, forms, and data tables
561.
by thunky 2y ago
> Composabilty and abstraction Also possible without react with far less complexity.
562.
by thunky 2y ago
And you also shouldn't expect anyone to use your software. Which of course is up to you.
563.
by thunky 2y ago
> Doesn't that seem a little unprecedented to you? Yeah it does, I don't disagree. But he won another election. By a lot. I remember the same despair when he was elected the first time, with predictions of the end of the worl
564.
by thunky 2y ago
I don't disagree with you (or Jefferson), but I'm not sure it's so different today than it ever was. I doubt that the population as a whole was ever super informed or fully resistent to lies, propaganda, and misinformation.
565.
by thunky 2y ago
> I guess people don't want to talk about that tho and prefer to rationalize Harris' loss. You're doing it again...repeating the same mistake of implying that everyone that supports Trump is an idiot, rather than trying to
566.
by thunky 2y ago
> The point is this: when Trump says the economy is doing badly, he's objectively lying Not to the person struggling. I'm not saying that Trump will actually improve their circumstances. I'm saying that, according to Berni
567.
by thunky 2y ago
> This isn't about an individual. It's about America's economy, which is broadly doing very well I think you may be missing the parent's point, because you're repeating the mistake. An individual doesn't car
568.
by thunky 2y ago
> I choose to overlook the faults Fair enough.
569.
by thunky 2y ago
You can show up later than him. Disrespect his time the same way he disrespects yours. That would be "fair". Or, try not to work with him anymore.
570.
by thunky 2y ago
> I honestly do not understand ActiveRecord ActiveRecord also does a terrible job of hiding the database or sql, even compared to other ORMs like Django's. So the price you pay for the it doesn't even buy you that much benefit

More ›