thrwaway6542

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by thrwaway6542 7y ago

   okay, you've got me. They can't. But this is a blog post "I don't think craig wright is satoshi" based on circumstantial evidence, and I don't really like using circumstantial evidence like this. People'
2. 2.▲
   by thrwaway6542 7y ago

   I mean not say anything substantial. It's a "hard" technical question, in that it's quite a technical paper. 9 pages is quite short, so there is a lot he would have left out, for example, though it was on his mind. Th
3. 3.▲
   by thrwaway6542 7y ago

   you're right, but it's not "hard" evidence. asking someone to work you through the process of a technical paper they had written is more of a technical question.
4. 4.▲
   by thrwaway6542 7y ago

   In my opinion it is easy to tell that. In any 9-page paper (very short) of such magnitude, there is a lot he would have left out at the time, but can still easily remember today. you can't really reconstruct that.
5. 5.▲
   by thrwaway6542 7y ago

   Satoshi wrote the bitcoin whitepaper, a nine-page document: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf can't you test Wright's claim by just saying "walk us through how you wrote this paper. the thought process, how it