okay, you've got me. They can't. But this is a blog post "I don't think craig wright is satoshi" based on circumstantial evidence, and I don't really like usi

okay, you've got me. They can't. But this is a blog post "I don't think craig wright is satoshi" based on circumstantial evidence, and I don't really like using circumstantial evidence like this. People's writing styles could be totally different in two different contexts. so I proposed a "hard" test, like a technical interview type of test. (Walk us how you wrote this). That is a good way to weed out bullshitters who are passing off someone else's work as their own, in a technical interview for example.