4 ms·
In my opinion it is easy to tell that. In any 9-page paper (very short) of such magnitude, there is a lot he would have left out at the time, but can still eas
by thrwaway6542 7y ago
In my opinion it is easy to tell that. In any 9-page paper (very short) of such magnitude, there is a lot he would have left out at the time, but can still easily remember today.
you can't really reconstruct that.
- bdcravens 7y agoMore importantly, how can an attorney/judge make the same deductions?
- thrwaway6542 7y agookay, you've got me. They can't. But this is a blog post "I don't think craig wright is satoshi" based on circumstantial evidence, and I don't really like using circumstantial evidence like this. People's writing styles could be totally different in two different contexts. so I proposed a "hard" test, like a technical interview type of test. (Walk us how you wrote this). That is a good way to weed out bullshitters who are passing off someone else's work as their own, in a technical interview for example.
- bdcravens 7y agoI would agree. Craig would never agree to such a test. He, and his followers, cling to the copyright granted on the whitepaper as some kind of established proof (which even the copyright office has said it isn't)