throwaway56098

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by throwaway56098 6y ago

   >Once again, you're not linking to a source document that explicitly presents evidence. This is the exact document that Rubio is referencing in his press release I linked above. The evidence presented explicitly presents no evidence
2. 2.▲
   by throwaway56098 6y ago

   >Given that, I think it's entirely appropriate to also look at the Republican-controlled Senate report that the OP linked, which says it did. Wrong, it said it did not find collision. Here's the summary from the lead on the US
3. 3.▲
   by throwaway56098 6y ago

   It's not a reach, it's factually what happened. Here's the summary from the lead on the US Senate Special Committee on Intelligence: https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases... “
4. 4.▲
   by throwaway56098 6y ago

   >Impressive, a throwaway account that uses the very controversial summary that Barr Or use the latest findings from the lead on the Senate Intel report: https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releas
5. 5.▲
   by throwaway56098 6y ago

   >You keep quoting the bits that are talking about the Mueller investigation and not the Senate Committee. Wrong, I am quoting the bits that are taking about the US Senate Special Committee on Intelligence report. >"the findings r