3 ms·
>Given that, I think it's entirely appropriate to also look at the Republican-controlled Senate report that the OP linked, which says it did. Wrong, it said it
by throwaway56098 6y ago
>Given that, I think it's entirely appropriate to also look at the Republican-controlled Senate report that the OP linked, which says it did.
Wrong, it said it did not find collision.
Here's the summary from the lead on the US Senate Special Committee on Intelligence:
https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=15CD9A7F-66B5-4700-9545-6974E593EA32 https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases...
“We can say, without any hesitation, that the Committee found absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election."
- VikingCoder 6y agoMore fuel for the fire: https://www.lawfareblog.com/republican-senators-misrepresent-their-own-russia-report https://www.lawfareblog.com/republican-senators-misrepresent... https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/08/19/marco-rubios-curious-summary-his-committees-russia-report/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/08/19/marco-rub...
- ModernMech 6y agoRubio says this, but that doesn’t comport with the contents of the report. Trump’s Campaign manager giving internal campaign data, to a man who the Senate Intel Committee characterizes as a “Russian intel Agent”. and then lying about it to the American people and the FBI is clearly evidence of collusion. For Rubio to make this statement, he needs to explain this finding of his committee.