3 ms·
>You keep quoting the bits that are talking about the Mueller investigation and not the Senate Committee. Wrong, I am quoting the bits that are taking about th
by throwaway56098 6y ago
>You keep quoting the bits that are talking about the Mueller investigation and not the Senate Committee.
Wrong, I am quoting the bits that are taking about the US Senate Special Committee on Intelligence report.
>"the findings run parallel to the conclusions of Mueller's probe"
"the findings [of the US Senate Special Committee on Intelligence] run parallel to the conclusions of Mueller's probe"
It's reconfirming that the Senate committee findings run parallel, or in other words, come to the same conclusion, as the Mueller report.
- dleslie 6y agoGood lord that's a reach. In stating they ran parallel they meant that they're investigating the same offences at the same time. It ran parallel, but did not collaborate with, the Mueller investigation. It found more evidence and drew stronger conclusions.
- throwaway56098 6y agoIt's not a reach, it's factually what happened. Here's the summary from the lead on the US Senate Special Committee on Intelligence: https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=15CD9A7F-66B5-4700-9545-6974E593EA32 https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases... “We can say, without any hesitation, that the Committee found absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election."
- th0ma5 6y agoSurely you can find the official report.