throwaway413

10 ms·

61.
by throwaway413 4y ago
This is amazing! Thanks for sharing, I follow Comma and somehow didn’t notice this announcement at all.
62.
by throwaway413 4y ago
Yep, the limit was a big piece of this issue and I forgot that detail. And nice, I’ll have to look into that! Thanks for this info, good to know.
63.
by throwaway413 4y ago
To the former point, you’re saying it doesn’t make sense for GQL, I’m saying why fix what isn’t broken? Request level caching works great for certain needs. But I get your point that it doesn’t apply as directly for GQL and yes, people do h
64.
by throwaway413 4y ago
Interesting, I see how that would not be as easily replicated with traditional REST. You would either need a bunch of requests or your client would need to be intimately familiar with the API. This leads me to think GQL has some benefits wh
65.
by throwaway413 4y ago
Nice, that’s a cool benefit, good point.
66.
by throwaway413 4y ago
Sure you can query over GET but to a single endpoint - so no ability to utilize built in browser caching for any requests you want to optimize unless you offload them from graphql. As for the 500, you can pass error details in the payload j
67.
by throwaway413 4y ago
Playing devils advocate here: Is the status code query specific or request specific? If I have a resolver that can handle multiple queries, does it matter if one or more queries internally fails? Doesn’t that mean the request was either deg
68.
by throwaway413 4y ago
What is the benefit of every request being POST? This makes caching a harder problem to solve. Also, why is every status code 200 even in the event of an error? They want you to pass an error key in your payload and have your client be proc
69.
by throwaway413 4y ago
Pretty interesting point, didn’t think of that. The casualty of it. It is rather intimidating to see someone piloting with a large controller, as opposed to just whipping out their phone like any other time. Definitely makes for a more low-
70.
by throwaway413 4y ago
Because putting food on the table so your family can eat isn’t a choice. Don’t have savings to burn through as you do that? Then it’s not a choice. Just one example. Morality may not be objective, but it surely isn’t just personal either. T
71.
by throwaway413 4y ago
So almost 1/10th of the Mini 2 flight time, for 6/10ths the price, and like 2/10ths the featureset and quality of capture. Do people really love Snapchat that much that they’d choose such a trade off for app integration alone
72.
by throwaway413 4y ago
So, 5-8 minutes max of flight time per battery…sigh. Even assuming 60-sec is the “default” flight time.
73.
by throwaway413 4y ago
Sure, but you have to go physically put your shovel in the hole first and then come back. …just be careful. There’s a man in the middle of the tunnel who will try to take your stuff.
74.
by throwaway413 5y ago
Nothing gets “installed” in the traditional sense on a chromebook. When you login to the chromebook, you can log in with any Google credentials. The credentials the school gave your son are managed by them. If you log into that account, it
75.
by throwaway413 5y ago
We have 70k channels in our slack at my current company. A large portion are deserted.
76.
by throwaway413 5y ago
Exactly what I was curious to know, thanks for sharing!
77.
by throwaway413 5y ago
Got it - you’re a great customer :) Thanks again for your input here, very helpful.
78.
by throwaway413 5y ago
Makes sense, thanks for your input here! Do you care that the food is left on the ground, or do you provide somewhere for them to set it? Does the heat dissipation from the ground bother you at all, since you take your time, or not a concer
79.
by throwaway413 5y ago
The markup is a huge issue, so many pockets to pay out. The multi-app issue is also quite rampant problem that I’m not sure how companies plan to address. I have some ideas. Thank you for your feedback here. So, if you could guarantee the s
80.
by throwaway413 5y ago
Seems like feedback so far is leaving food on the ground is a non-issue. Really appreciate your input here. There are definitely some issues I’ve noticed with timing algorithms, especially around multi-order deliveries.
81.
by throwaway413 5y ago
Great feedback, appreciate you taking the time. I wonder if a picture or something of your door ahead of time would help, not like there is a place to give this to drivers now. Tough problem to solve, very valid.
82.
by throwaway413 5y ago
Thank you! Helpful feedback.
83.
Ask HN: Thoughts on Food Deliveries
5 points by throwaway413 5y ago|18 comments
84.
by throwaway413 5y ago
I worked as a self taught software engineer for over the last decade starting from junior and climbing my way to seniority at small startups, some where I was the first engineering hire, some where I was employee #30-50. Last year for the f
85.
by throwaway413 5y ago
Ah, here we go. Have a good Sunday mate.
86.
by throwaway413 5y ago
“If he said "If you hire bottom of the barrel American developers" then nobody would have said a thing.” Because there is no existing, racist, “bottom of the barrel” stereotype around American devs.
87.
by throwaway413 5y ago
You’re right - I hear other less fortunate parts of the world are ready for their turn to get overworked and underpaid. Not like it has to do with the fact they hold the worlds largest populations or anything. Nah, you’re right. Their board
88.
by throwaway413 5y ago
Agree it’s the same thing! Two wrongs don’t make a right. Others behavior does not excuse my own. In this instance we are not talking about white men though so to use that as a counter argument would be plain whataboutism, but I understand
89.
by throwaway413 5y ago
Where did I assume bad intention? I explicitly said mistakes happen, chalking it up to accidental wording. Two comments up. [1] And yes, I went very far out of my way to comment on the website I visit multiple times a day. You can continue
90.
by throwaway413 5y ago
“Bottom of the barrel devs in India” !== “bottom of the barrel Indian devs” Way to move the goal posts. Do I need to explain this? You’ve contextualized the bucket in your new statement. Why do you think that efficiency difference exists in

More ›