4 ms·

Because putting food on the table so your family can eat isn’t a choice. Don’t have savings to burn through as you do that? Then it’s not a choice. Just one ex

Because putting food on the table so your family can eat isn’t a choice. Don’t have savings to burn through as you do that? Then it’s not a choice. Just one example. Morality may not be objective, but it surely isn’t just personal either. That’s what makes it a nuanced discussion, and not just a choice one makes. By deciding you want to do that in the future but first you need to save, are you deprioritizing it, or prioritizing it indirectly?

dzikimarian 4y ago
Most people in his country put food on family table without US-level software developer salary. It's hard to lower expectations of life quality, but let's not dramatize.
- leaflets2 4y ago
  Isn't everyone nitpicking at the word "insurmountable" :-) What if it wasn't meant to be taken literally
  - xtracto 4y ago
    Lol i came back to my comment and saw this thread... English is not my first language so you are right, I'm sorry my choice of word got people worked up.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]