Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
throwaway2331
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
61.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
I read through that article, as well as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicotinic_agonist , but they're shallow on details. I understand the low-level pharmacodynamics (but these are seldom useful when talking about
62.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
Read the original report your report is citing: 10.1001/jama.1988.03720190003002 (excerpt: https://sci-hub.se/10.1001/jama.1988.03720190003002 ) This reads like a thinly-veiled marketing piece for Nicorette (now ow
63.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
I still don't see it. The only justifications I've come across are a matter of post-hoc rationalization ("because nicotine is addictive, X, Y, and Z"; but no "nicotine is addictive, because A, B, C"), and takin
64.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
Do you have any evidence? I've done free base nic, salt nic, and nic polacrilex. Salt nic would be, in my opinion, the most habit-forming (but not addictive), due to a quick and high "peak," and quicker clearance -- leading t
65.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
The FDA doesn't source those claims. It seems more political, than empirical. Having used nicotine, tobacco, and been around people that have used nicotine and tobacco, there is little observational evidence that is addictive, relative
66.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
Nicotine is fairly non-addictive (in gum and patch form. Vapes, may be slightly more addictive due to oral fixation -- but still nothing compared to actual tobacco). Benefits are mostly in appetite suppression (if one is prone to overeating
67.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
Statistically significant != practically significant. It's almost impossible to deduce, due to this paper's horrid formatting.
68.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
I meant the very front-page/the landing page/i.e. https://github.com/ It cannot run it at all, because of all the graphics nonsense going on.
69.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
T500/W500, 4GB of RAM. It's something like 13 years old, and ~$60. It can run almost every website that hasn't been web-dev'ed into oblivion. It balks at anything with memory leaks and inefficient CPU/GPU load. It c
70.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
I feel after the first few bites, you'd be running on adrenaline. At that point, I believe it's apt to start elbow-dropping, curb-stomping, and punting monkeys. If for some unknown reason, 5 monkeys ambushed me on a regular walk,
71.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
I've been looking through monkey bites, and they're a lot more tame on human skin than they are on other monkeys. Macaques have large teeth and strong jaw muscles (as do dogs); but unlike dogs (or say even piranhas), it doesn'
72.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
> An adult male cannot physically take on a monkey. It is impossible. Still they don't attack. Are you positive? A chimpanzee: yes. A guerilla: indubitable. But a monkey? They seem like medium-sized dogs, that can move around quicke
73.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
May I recommend reading them in their original languages? It becomes impossible to truly appreciate a completely different culture, and way of thinking and seeing the world, when it's being tortuously twisted to fit into the "Engl
74.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
Note: "OP" is in reference to the GP/original poster of this "Ask HN." The greatest irony is that everything that was beaten into your unconscious mind as to what you "should do," and all the ways you lear
75.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
Normally, it would be poor form to pick apart someone's well thought-out reasoning, but your reasonings are not well thought-out: they're middle class talking points, and effectively propaganda, lacking any overarching cohesion. &
76.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
One of the greatest ironies of the 20th-21st centuries is that the lower and upper classes are closer to each other (in living a life driven by primal forces), than the middle classes are to either. Everything you've written is a middl
77.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
We could also simply do-away with level-headed discourse, and go back to the tried-and-true: "Billionaires are not your friends. They don't know you, they don't care about you, and they can do nothing for you -- except allow
78.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
Yes, and the Dutch East India Company was just a trading operation that had no long-term repercussions on the world. They're both transnationals (something that is an abomination against humanity, in my opinion). There is no good faith
79.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
Having spent the greater part of my life trying to be an unbiased, descriptivist bent on being a realist---I've realized it was a waste of time; and I was a coward. Neither world exists. There is no objective observation. Our senses ar
80.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
The point is that if there are people suffering throughout the world; and when one points to a very rare improbability as the "way out," while swiftly moving past the topic as "done and closed": that's a dumb take.
81.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
Granted a bachelors in C.S. (or to less effect in any other major). Granted x2 you have the funding available to pay for it (much less the time and energy if you have to work to pay for it -- i.e. your parents did not finance your tuition,
82.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
As I understand it, Britain's "grammar schools" did have an influence/were imported to the U.S. into the New England area. However, these were not free -- and I'm certain the reason for not allowing them to be more
83.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
In the case of philosophy, any semblance of it in the systems we're talking about is strictly post hoc: there was no "philosophy" involved -- only politics and the egos of those involved (see: Frederick William III). The prim
84.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
> Did Prussia really influence US education philosophy more than Britain did? I find that a bit hard to believe. Yes, if only because the people (General Education Board: Frederick Taylor Gates; Massachusetts Board of Education: Horace M
85.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
I had never read anything of his, but just now read through an article[0] and it seems like our observations match up (if only due to the shared ethnicity of our souls). Do you know which of his works pertains most closely to his thoughts o
86.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
We value different things. I would rather be a serf, or even a golden retriever.
87.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
I don't think its a matter of being a moron or not. I've been in the conditions you describe, even much worse. Rarely does the mind wander to "this sucks, this really fucking sucks. Things need to change." You're to
88.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
Absolutely. It was mostly a tangent I wanted to write out. On "other duties," I think a lot of people have that mindset in a partner: mechanically do these things that benefit my emotional state, while I mechanically do my things
89.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
An interesting note is that small business couples, where the man runs the trade-end of things (physician, skilled trades, etc.), and the woman runs the "managerial"-end (billing, paperwork, etc.) seem to be the most stable of cou
90.
▲
by
throwaway2331
5y ago
Having been in that position, I can genuinely say I would rather be a Russian serf, absolutely illiterate and uneducated, knowing nothing at all about how destitute my conditions are, than being in the position I am today (or especially in
More ›