teaneedz

14 ms·

91.
Headphone Jacks are about UX(teaz.me)
2 points by teaneedz 10y ago|0 comments
92.
by teaneedz 10y ago
How often does it need to be recharged? Will it last a whole day at the beach?
93.
by teaneedz 10y ago
This. Exactly my take too. Manufacturers are not as tuned in to user feedback as most might think. Many think they know better. No one worth any chops in UX though sees the removal of the audio jack as good. I've read and heard all the
94.
by teaneedz 10y ago
TL;DR Voluptatem aliquam soluta qui
95.
by teaneedz 10y ago
This is bad UX advice - period.
96.
by teaneedz 10y ago
Removing the ".@" syntax is a mistake. I don't always want to broadcast replies. I still don't understand why URLs are still included within the 140 char limit either. Can someone explain that better than the article?
97.
Reddit Technology will flag domains requiring readers to disable ad-blockers(reddit.com)
2 points by teaneedz 10y ago|0 comments
98.
by teaneedz 10y ago
This is a question anyone with a Yahoo! account should be asking.
99.
The IAB Is a Pot Calling the Kettle Black(teaz.me)
2 points by teaneedz 10y ago|0 comments
100.
by teaneedz 10y ago
He has it right - nobody cares. Even when people are made aware, they still don't care. Look at the security debacle of Snapchat, not to mention its lack of ethics. Even when the issues were exposed, the majority of users didn't c
101.
by teaneedz 10y ago
News and other content will always exist beyond Facebook. The sad part is watching adtech kill more businesses as it devours its own tail.
102.
by teaneedz 10y ago
Thank you for clarifying the first point. Agreed, the fundamental problem exists beyond tech and software. I guess coming to grips with that lets us use tech as a means to an end - a tool - that can be beneficial. The fact that we're d
103.
by teaneedz 10y ago
> Agonizing over these things is not a result of some profound grasp of reality and the ultimate causes for XYZ problems that have been around Since most problems are solved by first recognizing a problem exists, why is the OP's gra
104.
by teaneedz 10y ago
Personally, I believe the OP has valid concerns. "News" is not the culprit and blocking it is really not a long term viable solution since we will always be surrounded and impacted by the mindset and decisions of those driving tec
105.
by teaneedz 11y ago
You mean ad-tech platforms.
106.
by teaneedz 11y ago
"Watching more and more" because it's replacing regular television/cable for many. More video though means less actual content consumed - there's only so much time in a day. Plain text is still preferred by power us
107.
by teaneedz 11y ago
Sure. I didn't remove their source of revenue - their content still displayed for me, minus nefarious tracking, malverts and poor targeting. The solution is to stand up to ad-tech and advertisers and do ads the right way - one that res
108.
by teaneedz 11y ago
Ty. And there it is: "collaborate on new technology and advertising opportunities." I read that and laughed. I suppose their bed is for Millennials and Advertisers now, but it's kind of interesting that Advertisers still have
109.
by teaneedz 11y ago
Since my ad blockers are preventing this article from loading, I'm just going by the Title: bad move Mashable. I suppose that millennials consume the most videos, but power users rely on text, especially for consumption and sharing. Ad
110.
by teaneedz 11y ago
Yes, but Wickr keeps it encrypted - salted
111.
by teaneedz 11y ago
And I think that's really the messaging that needs to have some PR light shed upon. Facebook has access to the meta and contact data (confirmation, Moxie?). For all the hoopla over WhatsApp E2E crypto, users shouldn't forget that
112.
by teaneedz 11y ago
That's kind of what I was fearing. Would love to see an official response from Moxie on the meta and contact data handling of WhatsApp's implementation.
113.
by teaneedz 11y ago
I also wonder how Facebook will monetize WhatsApp with e2e now.
114.
by teaneedz 11y ago
How is the WhatsApp contact list data handled? Is it completely encrypted too or does Facebook have access to it?
115.
by teaneedz 11y ago
Not pirating since one has no indication if or what type of ad-tech is being used a site. It just takes one click to end up with malicious code or a UX headache. The website owner is responsible and does not even require an email from users
116.
by teaneedz 11y ago
Why a good VPN is pretty much a requirement now. I've been using F-Secure's products and really love seeing all the blocking it does.
117.
by teaneedz 11y ago
The PM is responsible for the requirements. If my PRD fails to be explicit or is not involved in the QA process, the PM needs to take ownership. Yes, everyone is responsible for the UX, but the PM especially.
118.
by teaneedz 11y ago
This was always a worse-case scenario to me - Verizon buying core Yahoo! I deleted my Yahoo account awhile back because I figured whoever ended up buying Yahoo would be looking at the purchase through myopic ad-tech vulture eyesight. Yahoo
119.
AOL’s Tim Armstrong Aims to Build Digital-Ad Empire at Verizon – Yahoo(wsj.com)
2 points by teaneedz 11y ago|1 comments
120.
by teaneedz 11y ago
Doesn't bug me as much as the Netflix attack against VPNs - which is akin to asking users to turn off their firewall or AV nowadays.

More ›