teaneedz

18 ms·

1. 121.▲
   by teaneedz 11y ago

   Yep. I haven't even attempted to click on a Forbes link (shared, or recommended) in ages. Any site that still serves interstitials also gets promptly sent to the pits of despair or dev/null.
2. 122.▲
   by teaneedz 11y ago

   Find an alternative to ad-supported business models maybe. Isn't much of this data used by/for the advertising industry?
3. 123.▲
   by teaneedz 11y ago

   [Encryption, Privacy Are Larger Issues Than Fighting Terrorism, Clarke Says : NPR]( http://www.npr.org/2016/03/14/470347719/encryption-and-priva... )
4. 124.▲
   by teaneedz 11y ago

   Disgraceful is a good word for sweeping this huge social issue to places it's less seen. Yep, there's plenty of blame to go around. I hope we don't become desensitized to the sufferings of others by moving "problems&quot
5. 125.▲
   by teaneedz 11y ago

   > Google's opponents don't need to generate outrage. We just don't seem to have an issue with "outrage" when the topic involves encryption. I don't see an issue with this article bringing to light bad practi
6. 126.▲
   by teaneedz 11y ago

   Empathy?
7. 127.▲
   by teaneedz 11y ago

   I thought the article was helpful in shedding light on this disgraceful practice. If Google is part of it, it deserves to be called out on it. The problem may be bigger than just one company, but it doesn't mean that just because other
8. 128.▲
   by teaneedz 11y ago

   And now that Netflix is blocking VPNs and requesting users to weaken their security, we may be watching Netflix less too.
9. 129.▲
   Netflix attacks VPNs(teaz.me)

   2 points by teaneedz 11y ago|1 comments
10. 130.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    LOL ... sorry. Alt link: https://ello.co/teanee/post/CIe6nfLQNDpPlxNrCyezBw
11. 131.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    Trustworthy sums this app up.
12. 132.▲
    Twitter in crash and burn mode(teaz.me)

    3 points by teaneedz 11y ago|2 comments
13. 133.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    https://twitter.com/bhcarpenter/status/695811814244773892 https://twitter.com/ptr/status/696025411898085376 read the timelines ... very interesting. the first is from a Twitter iOS dev,
14. 134.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    Also, tweets from a dev and former PM this evening both demonstrate an unforgiveable level of dismissive arrogance toward user feedback. Twitter is clueless when it comes to UX.
15. 135.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    RIP Twitter is trending
16. 136.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    Thank you. Exactly my feelings.
17. 137.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    HN is behind the times, but the Boreal app has made it functional on a smartphone by having a responsive design and some other cool features.
18. 138.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    This is par for the course with most tech companies that fail to get CX. Some are better though than others and a small handful actually attempt to be responsive online. Twitter gets an F for online support.
19. 139.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    If it makes dumb product decisions like dropping the audio jack just to make a slimmer phone, I won't be thinking of iPhone anymore.
20. 140.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    Based on tweets with the #Twitter10k hashtag, many users don't think it sounds like a good idea. Wall Street and the userbase seem to both agree for once.
21. 141.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    it's a short-term fix. also, the details will likely introduce UX issues when so many others could have been addressed. this, along with a non-reverse chronological timeline is a product pivot with lots of risk. maybe it'll work o
22. 142.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    typo above. not his tweet but this tweet (which BTW would look better in MD
23. 143.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    I think Twitter is going to do it. I agree with his tweet: > Given how much the best users of twitter hate the idea of a 10k char limit for tweets, it will definitely happen. :( So as long as it's going to do it, can I request that
24. 144.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    I agree ethanbond with your 3rd para. It will muddle the product definition even further. It's rather telling to me that Twitter is willing to AB this without concern for its image or userbase - one that is mostly providing negative se
25. 145.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    sorry ;) I guess I came across as trollish, but I really loved Twitter and it's difficult to see it on its current path. There were so many historical and important industry news items I learned first on Twitter. Twitter owns the in-th
26. 146.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    actually we get the implementation, but it is bad UX practise. it adds friction to the reading experience and will increase the quantity of tweets with truncated text within the first 140 chars. Twitter poorly handles this already with its
27. 147.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    it's what gave Twitter it's identity and allowed me to discover valuable information quickly. sticking a read more button to expand a tweet is just lazy and bad UX but worse, alters the fundamental usefulness of Twitter for me. i
28. 148.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    2016 is the year Twitter jumped the shark. https://ello.co/teanee/post/0M0OKQLGuxdtXpjHKXAq1w
29. 149.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    Also without any specifics on how this will not be abused - Twitter really needs a lesson in comms. Would much rather hear a firm statement that they are keeping reverse chronological tweets and 140 char limits because that is their identit
30. 150.▲
    by teaneedz 11y ago

    You don't do this and expect to be in PR long.