Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tcd
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
151.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
So don't store data in iCloud? It's perfectly possible to perform your own encryption and hold the private key yourself.
152.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
"Neutis runs modern Linux kernel based on the mainline version. Unlike other modules that are stuck with old legacy kernels without updates, Neutis will get security fixes and new features on time." You must clarify that. You are
153.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
The only one was Cloudflare on another project (file hosting) - and being fair, we did do 20tb of transfer in a single month on the free tier, which they weren't so pleased about :P. that really crippled the website and we struggled to
154.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
Thanks for adding nothing to the discussion - the team page tells me nothing about the challenges they're going to face, and how they're going to overcome them. Even Google, struggles, since they've been running Youtube at a
155.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
Having had experience in streaming to many thousands of users myself I think what you're doing here is certainly interesting - having taken a look at your service it seems likely you're using nginx and possibly RTMP module? At lea
156.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
> Because it's a way to make money You're not making money if they're refunding the client. This article and people in this thread suggest it's a terrible way to make money and to AVOID at all costs. Or, you can use t
157.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
Why is this page rendering 19654 lines of code? And what the hell is this about: https://i.imgur.com/5tREuGB.png Just for a blog? Yeah, I'll pass. Anyone who wants to bypass this crap can do so here: https://
158.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
That example you linked uses absolutely NO CSS or JS! Which yes, is fine and in theory it should work "forever", but any extra functionality and you can't be sure. Open standards change, software changes and things move on. I
159.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
> our widget asks for your phone number I'm good.
160.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
tl;dr for the most useless article I've ever read. See links: https://amphp.org/ https://reactphp.org/ Was basically the article. r/savedyouaclick
161.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
Why do people like you feel that's acceptable? Software can work from anywhere between a few hours to a decade before an update is required, and it entirely depends on what you're doing. Websites evolve, and that's the choice
162.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
Once v6 reaches the same adoption of v4 then it'd make sense to transition v4 out. I'm guessing addresses will be released and not redistributed again, eventually completing a total recall of v4. We're still 2-3 decades at a
163.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
Facebook made the transition plausible; a formal social network, then slowly, the creep began, where it's now acceptable to use your real name online. I still heed the advice of the 90's: NEVER use your real name. We still have th
164.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
Yeah, any site that pops-up "pls whitelist us!!" gets an instant X on the tab from me. It sucks, but I will never tolerate ads of any kind, no matter how good or bad. To me, they are done, along with tracking on the web (including
165.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
Even if you could buy a browser do you seriously believe that would change _anything_, like even in the slightest? These days they still track you whether you buy or not, the data is simply too valuable to ignore.
166.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
Damn, the future of IoT is so exciting. Hackable fridges, microwaves, showers...The possibilities are endless. Maybe Anon can hack Ajit Pai so he only has cold showers from now on :P.
167.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
I wonder from a societal point of view how data is put into the "public" and "private" camp. This is one of hundreds of leaks, and there are many more thousands to come over the next decade. It's to the point where
168.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
> I don't think there's a technological solution to this problem Lol of course there is. 1: IP alerts - new IP? email alert. 2: 2FA - should be standard, requiring a physical device to login 3: Deterrents; seems slightly fishy?
169.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
Doesn't this contradict FB's terms and conditions [1] I quote: > You will not use Facebook if you are under 13. [1]: https://www.facebook.com/terms.php
170.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
> I agree. I use Edge, I think I found the problem. Check caniuse.com for Edge's webplatform score. Edge: 236 Chrome: 304 Firefox: 298 Yup. You're going to have a bad time with that. P.S: this should work with Edge16 (requires
171.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
Welcome to technology? If you decide to dabble in this industry then you MUST assume what you do will be outdated in a week - Bitcoin is changing on an HOURLY basis. It moves fast, very fast, faster than any other industry on the planet, te
172.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
You post this when india just got the toughest laws on Net Neutrality in the world [1]. This guy is clearly fishing for clicks (outrageous headline!) and wants to invite the trolls to comment pages. He's not right, he never has been, a
173.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
Sure, you can hate a programming language. It changes absolutely nothing, except your potential revenue streams. It's like saying "I loathe Linux!!" and knowing nothing about it; sure, but in this industry, you're going
174.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
The law makes sense though from one perspective, as silly as this sounds. Having sex is far less worse than a video/picture of you naked, which may exist on the internet for a very, very long time. Think Amanda Todd and it being used a
175.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
"Images of child pornography are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually expl
176.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
How do you propose fixing the problem? Not giving teens/kids smartphones is a sensible start, but that's not realistic, and they don't have the awareness (or the logical thing that screams "don't do this") deve
177.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
It's not physically possible to design a UI that's going to be intuitive for all 7 billion human beings, there will always be people who don't 'get it' or make mistakes. We've come a long, long way from the day
178.
▲
by
tcd
9y ago
> and don't want them to...an alternative must be created Of course, collecting user data is fundamental to providing these services, for FREE - without this, Youtube's algorithm would be awful and Google Maps wouldn't be