4 ms·
That example you linked uses absolutely NO CSS or JS! Which yes, is fine and in theory it should work "forever", but any extra functionality and you can't be su
by tcd 9y ago
That example you linked uses absolutely NO CSS or JS! Which yes, is fine and in theory it should work "forever", but any extra functionality and you can't be sure.
Open standards change, software changes and things move on. If you are seriously relying on anything technological working for a decade or more you're out your mind.
You need to keep up and adapt because nobody gives a crap about you or your use case. Here we see Google doing what it thinks best and you need to live with this.
- PeterisP 9y agoOf course it doesn't use CSS and JS, none of those existed back in 1992 when the website was made. However, content using CSS1 and javascript 1.0 standards (1996?) should also work in modern browsers; but I couldn't easily find any sites that actually use them and haven't been updated for the last 20+ years to test it; the sites from e.g. 1997-1999 seem to avoid it like the plague since back then you couldn't rely on CSS1 and javascript 1.0 being properly supported. So yes, just as modern browsers support all web technologies since their very start - a CSS3 compliant browser should be compatible also with CSS2 and CSS1 (20+years old), I'm quite convinced that 20 years into future when we might have CSS 5 or 6, the current CSS3 content will also work as well. New javascript doesn't work on ancient browsers, but ancient javascript works well in modern browsers, that's a core design principle of the web standards - we build them for compatibility.