Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tagrun
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
43 ms
·
211.
▲
by
tagrun
9y ago
Ah, missed that, thanks
212.
▲
by
tagrun
9y ago
References on the name https://godotengine.org/article/godot-history-images https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waiting_for_Godot > In fact, Godot was just a code-name for what would be something els
213.
▲
by
tagrun
9y ago
People here got the idea totally wrong so far. You can see from "WHY VISUAL SCRIPTING?" section in https://godotengine.org/article/godot-getting-more-languages that it's mainly a tool for programmers to
214.
▲
by
tagrun
9y ago
That's plain wrong. C# bindings have nothing to do with GDNative, it's a module on it's own, integrated pretty well and unlike things that can be bound through GDNative, Mono module will be a part of Godot itself. https:
215.
▲
by
tagrun
9y ago
You can ask for integer solutions in Mathematica with > Solve[x/(y + z) + y/(z + x) + z/(x + y) == 4, {x, y, z}, Integers] but it gives a very long output in terms of Root[]s and conditional expressions.
216.
▲
by
tagrun
9y ago
No, that is rather a Solaris quirk. That's ancient (literally) sysv behavior and killall in neither OpenBSD, nor FreeBSD work like that today. So in practice, what you're saying isn't relevant to majority of *nix users today.
217.
▲
by
tagrun
9y ago
The author is basically complaining that Go (and its standard library) isn't functional.
218.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
What you described is basically true for any job, and it's more about the culture surrounding the language and particular use case rather than the entry level. I've seen a lot of people in academia writing C++, mostly horrible cod
219.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
Except it's not really attractive to many capable people in their right mind who wouldn't wanna go down that rabbit hole called academia with low salaries, uncertain future, require you to constantly look for a new job and move ar
220.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
> As a company, I cant do that. I need an invoice. ...which you get through the FSF donation link he provided. It's amazing that this is the top comment.
221.
▲
ASUS Tinker Board’s Debian and Kodi Linux Images, Schematics and Documentation
(cnx-software.com)
73 points
by
tagrun
10y ago
|
34 comments
222.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
You just gave details on how and why they flipped their stance on EME. And you're essentially saying they traded market share for their principles about free internet. You're basically agreeing with me. > At that point they imp
223.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
Firefox has also been a pawn in Mozilla's corporate strategies many times. They changed Firefox users' default search engine to Yahoo, not only in new installations but overriding existing settings, after Mozilla cut a deal with Y
224.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
I think I've wasted enough time with your ignorant ramblings. Yeah, yeah, go and live with your delusions happily ever, "pal". Shoo.
225.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
If only IEEE-754 math worked as infinite-precision math. You should first learn some basics about floating point numbers before attempting to make such strong assertions to correct people with such a bossy attitude (you're 100% wrong B
226.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
Except in floating point arithmetic there aren't two equidistant integers. What I expect is, Mathematica doesn't make promises about stuff that can be affected by an infinitesimal change, with a floating point input. I don't
227.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
I don't remember Mathematica was ever like this, although I didn't use Round[] much either. It does what I would expect it to do today: http://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/Round.html Round[x]
228.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
It's an LXDE theme, plus a few aesthetic modifications to a few LXDE programs. I wouldn't call it an OS or a DE.
229.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
Wow. So, behind all your marketing buzzwords, you're trying to portray GNU/Linux software as buggy in contrast to superior Mac/Windows, which has, interestingly, long been a FUD and a lie propagated by Microsoft. This suddenl
230.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
And before you say anything about conveniences of SaaSS in collaborative work flow: I'm a professor and I've been writing papers, posters, presentations, books, etc using latex for like 2 decades. I'm pretty sure I used LaTeX
231.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
This is a false anecdotal dichotomy: either install latex on your computer at the cost of "clogging up your filesystem" (whatever that means), or give up your freedoms. textlive-most (which is a meta package which includes almost
232.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
What? Do install LaTeX. I don't know (and frankly don't care) how hard it is under Windows, Mac or Android, but it has been readily available from the package managers with GNU/* and most BSDs for decades, easy to install a
233.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
Apart from AUR build as others have pointed out, there is a repo for that https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pantheon
234.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
And as a physicist, I disagree with you. Not specifically about your view of history (which I still think is important), but the way you think about Nature in general. Quoting Feynman www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_02.html > The
235.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
Signal/TextSecure was released in 2014. Can you be specific about the "many boxes" you're referring to? The most relevant to the grandparent being: has it ever been audited?
236.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
Gosh. Any bound particle has discrete energy levels. It can be as small as a single nucleus (as in the case of a single isolated atom), or it can be large as in an electron in a real-life material you see around. The mathematics is more com
237.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
> Then why do group of atoms (eg. gold) have a color, but not an individual atom? Color is not an inherent property of particles (I'm not talking about "color charge" here of course, which is something else entirely and ha
238.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
Let me guess, you got those "scientific" results from the Scientific Journal of Social Academics, using that "other method that reproduces reliable knowledge", so this must be correct! And it can't have anything to
239.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
> Science should be well defined, but not limited to arbitrary confines. > Well-defined science is frankly an insult to science. Spoken like a true pseudoscientist. Yes, it should be an insult, right? How dare they can expect a scient
240.
▲
by
tagrun
10y ago
Thank you for playing along and justifying everything I said.
More ›