3 ms·
You just gave details on how and why they flipped their stance on EME. And you're essentially saying they traded market share for their principles about free in
by tagrun 10y ago
You just gave details on how and why they flipped their stance on EME. And you're essentially saying they traded market share for their principles about free internet. You're basically agreeing with me.
> At that point they implemented it so that they could stay relevant,
...instead of fighting it without giving up.
> And market share isn't a "corporate" concern
This literally makes 0 sense to me. Do you actually believe this?
Market share share is vital to Mozilla Corporation's business, which they have been using to cut million dollar deals with Yahoo, Google, etc. I don't wanna go all the want and say "you're the product", but they basically monetize their collective user base. So regardless of how they/you spin it, I don't buy that it's not a corporate concern.
- azrazalea 10y agoTo be clear, I meant market share isn't solely a corporate concern. Certainly it is in the corporation's best interest, but it is also a very big interest from a non-profit/altruistic perspective.