swores

46 ms·

841.
by swores 3y ago
Worse (IMO) than that is the fact that when the privacy mode is turned on, you can't access your previously saved conversations nor will it save anything you do while it's enabled. Really shitty behaviour.
842.
by swores 3y ago
I mostly agree with what you've written, but I don't think this is completely reasonable: > If you disagree, but are too lazy to explain why, that is very lame. I'll agree that generally it would be better for the commun
843.
by swores 3y ago
Maybe try and stop caring about internet points - other than acting as a prompt to ask yourself "do these downvotes mean I should think more about what I said and consider whether it was a good thing to say", downvotes don't
844.
by swores 3y ago
They'll be responding to things like temperature, ph level, etc. since they don't have a map to follow, and over many many generations the ones that follow the environmental clues that lead them to the best places for them to go w
845.
by swores 3y ago
I'm far from an expert so you should probably ask someone other than me. But my two cents would be not to paste any code until you have understood it, or unless it's written by a source you trust, or alternatively only paste it so
846.
by swores 3y ago
If you're not joking, you're quoting a rule from a different website... which even if it were a rule on this website, I still wouldn't consider the quote in this title to be breaking.
847.
by swores 3y ago
The paper linked to in the article doesn't go into detail on that, but does say " Six months after surgery (3 months after ceasing dexamethasone) [...] Neuropsychiatric symptoms had improved but persisted " https:/&#x2F
848.
by swores 3y ago
"Some people" including both the founder (pg) and the main moderator (dang) of HN (and me too, though my opinion doesn't matter much outside the bounds of this comment). The thinking I've seen explained before - and pers
849.
by swores 3y ago
I was on the fence about that when submitting, but decided to stick with "use the original title" as the simpler option. But I would be fine if dang wanted to edit that out (or not).
850.
Live worm found in Australian woman’s brain(theguardian.com)
228 points by swores 3y ago|153 comments
851.
by swores 3y ago
Thanks :)
852.
by swores 3y ago
You may not see this two weeks later comment, but in case you do have reply notifications or check the threads page: Thanks for the timestamp function! I can't believe it never occurred to me to do something like that before, and unlik
853.
by swores 3y ago
I suspect that anyone reading this thread is likely to be equally interested in "Ask HN: Share a shell script you like" from a fortnight ago (though at 78 comments, it didn't get as much traction / comments as I hoped it
854.
by swores 3y ago
They were talking about whether or not the OS comes with Perl by default, not whether it has a CLI at all.
855.
by swores 3y ago
That's not really a ChatGPT issue, people pasting in slightly wrong commands (or right commands in the wrong folder) is a tale as old as time - well, as old as linux at least. Short of saying that nobody who's already an expert sh
856.
by swores 3y ago
I'm curious to know how many people you get paying for something like your "Magical one-liners", and also whether you've ever experimented with a "choose to pay after" model? I ask because it's the kind of
857.
by swores 3y ago
See also 86 comments a day ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37256484
858.
by swores 3y ago
Thanks, bookmarked!
859.
by swores 3y ago
Fair enough to not want to engage, but in that case you could just not engage rather than adding more snark. But ideally, even if you think they don't deserve your explanation, considering it's a public forum you could still expla
860.
by swores 3y ago
> As much as I love the hacker spirit of cracking open hardware and software and bending it to your will (whether or not it was designed towards that end), I enjoy my reMarkable precisely because I can get away from the ubiquity of comp
861.
by swores 3y ago
In my opinion, saying that without explaining what they misunderstood / what you disagree with them on is both snarky and unsubstantial enough to fall below the line of the HN guidelines. Especially as it's not clear to me that th
862.
by swores 3y ago
Hadn't thought of that, good point
863.
The EU has just clamped down on big tech. Britain, take note. (DSA)(theguardian.com)
3 points by swores 3y ago|1 comments
864.
by swores 3y ago
My (wrong) intuition on reading your comment was that you were over-estimating the expected growth in performance over that time period, but actually after checking the maths based on Moore's Law, i.e. doubling every two years (though
865.
by swores 3y ago
Or maybe people are just more interested in arguing for/against the first one and a comments thread like this seems like a good place for it? It's not like they're such unrelated topics that discussing beekeeping ethics in th
866.
by swores 3y ago
> I'd say hunters care a lot more about, and do more for, nature in their local ecosystem than your average city dwelling vegan hipster. I don't think you've met many vegan hipsters, as while I can't claim to be eit
867.
by swores 3y ago
Business Intelligence and Monthly Active Users
868.
by swores 3y ago
Am I right to assume there aren't any PEDs that are useful without having negatives? I have no interest in competing/fairness, the only weight training I do is a) very light and b) just to have slightly stronger muscles to make th
869.
by swores 3y ago
If that was the intention then I indeed would have just agreed and not replied
870.
by swores 3y ago
I don't see anything in your comment that suggests a problem with their plan if the goal is to prevent vehicles from being too loud.... sure there may be some vehicles that are too loud because of good intentions on the emissions side,

More ›