4 ms·
I don't see anything in your comment that suggests a problem with their plan if the goal is to prevent vehicles from being too loud.... sure there may be some v
by swores 3y ago
I don't see anything in your comment that suggests a problem with their plan if the goal is to prevent vehicles from being too loud.... sure there may be some vehicles that are too loud because of good intentions on the emissions side, but that doesn't change the fact that they're too loud?
- zdragnar 3y ago> i think Amsterdam is going to be surprised at just how many "clean idle" diesel and modern trucks they are going to catch simply due to the nature of the regulation To me, this didn't read as a problem with the plan so much as an observation that they're going to be catching a broader profile of problem vehicles than they anticipated. All in all, probably a good thing, but (as a foreigner who hasn't been there) it was, for me, an interesting observation.
- johnwalkr 3y agoIt took me a few reads to come to the conclusion that this was the meaning instead of opposing the law. It feels like in needs an extra sentence along the lines of "this law will also help prevent work-arounds of existing emissions regulations."
- swores 3y agoIf that was the intention then I indeed would have just agreed and not replied