swores

61 ms·

871.
by swores 3y ago
But that then requires using regex each time? So if there's a file I'm looking for called test.txt I could run "lsg test" and find it using their function but fail to find it using this alias? Or am I mistaken, I'm
872.
by swores 3y ago
Im confused as to how you reached the conclusion that probiotics and those supplements speeds up the recovery, if your data points are 1) that took 9 months to recover and 2) that only happened in the last week. Is it that this week's
873.
by swores 3y ago
When it was first suggested that doctors/surgeons not washing hands & medical equipment between patients was harming patients, the majority of the medical community was up in arms calling the person who suggested it crazy and takin
874.
by swores 3y ago
I've found - when using ChatGPT with GPT4 - that sometimes when I ask it to do two things like that it will ignore my request to do one before the other and try to do both at the same time before providing a combined answer, unless I g
875.
by swores 3y ago
Have you completely missed the point I made or are you joking? I wasn't defending their argument, I was pointing out why your rebuttal of their argument wasn't a rebuttal at all.
876.
by swores 3y ago
Whether you agree or disagree with their overall claim, do you really think that either you or they couldn't find a 6th example, and more, of failings like those 5? It seems obvious to me that they gave 5 because they're writing a
877.
by swores 3y ago
That's fair enough, enjoy!
878.
by swores 3y ago
I wouldn't normally approve of anyone writing this sort of comment, but fuck it: Do not bother reading comments in this thread. The hot takes are already ridiculous, and I honestly don't know why I either bothered to start reading
879.
by swores 3y ago
> "It seems someone at The NY Times is very sympathetic to him." Has their coverage of him been positive? I've not read any of it so I don't have a clue, but in a hypothetical situation where you're a journalis
880.
by swores 3y ago
If he considered starting serving time early a win for himself then he could've chosen not to be bailed. Therefore I don't see how you can call it a win for him if it's not what he wants.
881.
by swores 3y ago
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make about LK99 other than feeling smug for some weird reason? Maybe I was looking in the wrong place about people discussing LK99, but I've seen a lot of comments/tweets/art
882.
by swores 3y ago
The people saying that were presumably making predictions about whether or not he'd be found guilty with a jail sentence (which hasn't yet happened), not that if he does something as stupid as witness tampering he wouldn't ha
883.
by swores 3y ago
Wouldn't it be even better if people who have a legitimate need, like you, could get the vehicle and associated taxes subsidised or even free, while people who don't need it do pay more for their choice? (This was the case for a r
884.
by swores 3y ago
Yes (in either order)
885.
by swores 3y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37022243
886.
by swores 3y ago
I'm afraid I don't think I've got an article in me about this, sorry :( I've got pretty good instincts when it comes to figuring out likelihood of PMF when it comes to products for gamers, but I'm not sure I could a
887.
by swores 3y ago
Then I'm pretty pleased with my random $80k as an example of a salary that isn't near the top industry wise, but still has a sizeable pool of people earning, within which there's top - relatively - talent! Thanks
888.
by swores 3y ago
I dont live in the US, I was picking a random non-best-developer-in-the-world salary to make the point, not trying to accurately price specific jobs. But surely 100-120k is far too small a range even for the US considering the variance of s
889.
by swores 3y ago
But it's not just "top talent" as in the people who can walk into the number one company in an industry and negotiate their millions in compensation, it's "top talent" as in "the upper segment of whatever
890.
Ship some cocaine with me (2023)(talkingdrugs.org)
6 points by swores 3y ago|0 comments
891.
by swores 3y ago
Hmm that's a really good question, I'm going to have a think about it before bed and see if a good night's sleep can help, but I'm not too optimistic I'll be able to write a particularly good article to answer that.
892.
Ask HN: Is there a marketing-related topic you'd like an article written about?
3 points by swores 3y ago|6 comments
893.
by swores 3y ago
Nah, there are drugs that already exist in the body (such as the extremely strong psychedelic DMT, which naturally occurs in tiny amounts within human brains and within many other animals and plants). There isn't a hard scientific boun
894.
by swores 3y ago
Read the sentence after the one you quoted in their comment and you'll see they clearly weren't blaming the laptop.
895.
by swores 3y ago
Despite not being privy to the details, I am familiar enough with this sort of marketing to be extremely confident that Google and McDonalds (and other big brands) did indeed negotiate specific terms including promotion of McDonalds locatio
896.
by swores 3y ago
Google Maps (and even more so Waze which they own) already had partnerships with various brands - for example, type McDonalds into Google Maps (at least in the UK) and it has the M logo next to "see locations" as soon as you'
897.
by swores 3y ago
That seems as pointless a question as suggesting that enjoying TV shows means you shouldn't care if everyone in your life constantly lies to you.
898.
by swores 3y ago
Good links thanks, and I'll add: the % of NHS's budget being pushed to private providers has been steadily increasing every year for over a decade. If you have £x to pay nurses (or CT scanning machine operating costs, or cleaning
899.
by swores 3y ago
Setting aside the fact that things like BBC have nothing to do with energy taxes... Let's say there are X things government currently funds thanks to energy taxes, and overnight everybody stops paying for energy - do you think governme
900.
by swores 3y ago
When you have to resort to refusing to engage in an actual debate and just throwing questions back to confuse the conversation you're no longer arguing in good faith - though it's not clear to me you ever were.

More ›