solosoyokaze

13 ms·

31.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
“Fag” is most definitely a slur. A slur you’re arguing it’s ok to use.
32.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
I don’t want to live in a world where racism and discrimination are accepted. Pretty simple actually.
33.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
Your case to freely be racist with no repercussions is unconvincing. 4chan’s cover story doesn’t matter. It’s clearly a huge center for racism and other forms of discrimination. You’re literally arguing to use slurs. 4chan most definitely e
34.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
The "community" is the actual world we live in. A message board isn't isolated from that. It's offensive and a slur in the real world, of which 4chan is a tiny subset.
35.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
It doesn't matter how they claim it's being used. It's a slur. The user of the slur doesn't get to decide who's offended by it. It's an offensive term just like the N word.
36.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
These words are always racist. It doesn’t matter what 4chan claims.
37.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
It’s offensive off 4chan, it doesn’t matter what they think.
38.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
You clearly do have a horse in this race. Read the thread, it’s about /pol Here's the OP: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26918378
39.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
Still proves my point. You don’t have to censor that.
40.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
I'm talking about /pol since that's what the original post was about. You can't move the goalposts to all of 4chan.
41.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
It's offensive to everyone who's not a racist. Is that your definition of "outsider"? What do you think those words mean?
42.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
> "these words are used solely for the purpose of expressing racist and homophobic feelings". There's no other way to use these words. They're always racist and homophobic. That's the point, /pol is a cess
43.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
He didn’t provide an example, unless you think trolling journalists is a “gem”. His other claim is unfounded. There should be a "BS Law" were someone claims to have evidence, then refuses to present it no matter how pressed. He cl
44.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
You claimed there was something beyond the surface level racism and white supremacy, but you haven't really provided that. Trolling journalists doesn't make them any less racist, especially when they use racism for trolling. There
45.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
Trolling journalists doesn't sound like "gems", it sounds like a waste of time (and I'm no fan of most journalists). The Peter Bright article you posted has no mention of /pol.
46.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
> But there are definitely occasional gems in the rough that can be found there that cannot be found elsewhere. Can you give an example of a gem? I've only seen the racist trash side (that's certainly what's on the board
47.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
Are the posters in this thread arguing that George Floyd was a junkie, trolls too? There is a ton of legitimate white supremacy here masked by "trolling". It's just a convenient cover, but the beliefs are authentically held
48.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
> You have n-words That you have to blank that out and none of the others, should tell you everything you need to know about how equal or "endearing" this is. Bongs, Leafs, Burgers... This is all white supremacy no matter how
49.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
For me? Honestly, no. I've been avoiding J&J products as much as possible (it's impossible to fully do it) for years. I won't even say that the issues with the J&J vaccine are indicative or related to their past actio
50.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
Everyone should take the vaccine, but: > Also are you surprised that Black people in the South don't want this experimental vaccine after the Tuskegee Experiment? Is a super important and valid point. Historically Black people hav
51.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
Why are all of these posts being flagged to death?
52.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
People have a right to be outraged. To say otherwise is to impede on freedom of speech. > Your claim that he defended somebody in a sex trafficking ring is not actually true, for example. He continues to defend Minsky. This a fact . I
53.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
The FSF is already beyond useless. They don't "need" anything as they don't accomplish anything. It's just a cult of personality around RMS at this point. It's beyond redemption.
54.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
You don't have to be an "SJW" to be disgusted with Stallman. The vast, vast majority of people will not defend someone involved in a child sex trafficking ring. That doesn't make you a "socialist", it makes you
55.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
Why should anyone be subjected to RMS’ opinion on the age of consent? Or the Epstein case? RMS created this situation by injecting his unwanted opinions into to public sphere and now he’s rightfully paying the price for that.
56.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
It’s not slander if it’s true, and you can be disgusted with RMS without bringing politics into it. He’s bad for the free software movement. It’s as simple as that.
57.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
There were no “wrongful accusations”. RMS did all of the stuff people are upset about. It’s not fabricated.
58.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
Socialism has nothing to do with RMS’ disgusting behavior. The tide is turning in that people won’t accept this from the old guard anymore. It has nothing to do with political philosophy.
59.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
How is it political? What politics are even involved? This very much is a personal issue with Stallman. His objectionable behavior isn’t tied to political beliefs, it’s tied to an individual’s moral and social failings.
60.
by solosoyokaze 5y ago
This is all true, but there's also a not insignificant group of people that do have both parents working solely for the money and wfh allows those people to move to a one income household since work is no longer coupled to real estat

More ›