8 ms·

Your case to freely be racist with no repercussions is unconvincing. 4chan’s cover story doesn’t matter. It’s clearly a huge center for racism and other forms o

Your case to freely be racist with no repercussions is unconvincing. 4chan’s cover story doesn’t matter. It’s clearly a huge center for racism and other forms of discrimination. You’re literally arguing to use slurs. 4chan most definitely exists in the real world and is subject to its morals. It doesn’t matter if you use a slur at a private club, Internet forum or at home. It doesn’t change its offensiveness.

throwaway0xa 5y ago
>Your case to freely be racist with no repercussions is unconvincing. Stop strawmaning and shifting the goal posts because you've been proven wrong. We're not talking about racism in our thread here. >4chan’s cover story doesn’t matter It's not a "cover story", it's logically what's happening. >You’re literally arguing to use slurs. Wrong, they're not slurs. Just checked the dictionary, and "Archfag" is not listed as a slur. Neither is "oldfag" or "summerfag". Now you're literally arguing delusions that you've created that are nonsensical.
- solosoyokaze 5y ago
  “Fag” is most definitely a slur. A slur you’re arguing it’s ok to use.
  - throwaway0xa 5y ago
    >“Fag” is most definitely a slur. No one is being called a "fag" though. >A slur you’re arguing it’s ok to use. I've successfully argued that "Archfag", "oldfag", etc. are not slurs, and are therefore OK to use. QED.
    - solosoyokaze 5y ago
      You’ve successfully exposed yourself as homophobic. QED
      - throwaway0xa 5y ago
        > You’ve successfully exposed yourself as homophobic. More delusions from you, not that I'm surprised. I am homosexual and fully support homosexuality. It is logically impossible for me to be homosexual. QED. You've successfully exposed yourself as delusional here after getting owned. I won.
        solosoyokaze 5y ago
        I don't believe you, but for the sake of argument, if you were actually a gay person that somehow bonked your head and scrambled your brains to the point where you thought it was a good idea for white supremacists to use a slur that leads directly to violence against your friends and yourself, it would still be a slur since 99.9999% of gay people would say it was.
        throwaway0xa 5y ago
        >I don't believe you There's that delusion again! >if you were actually a gay person that somehow bonked your head and scrambled your brains Now you're IMAX-level projecting about being delusional and deranged. >white supremacists to use a slur For the fifth time, it's not a slur, and stop moving the goal posts and building straw men. >that leads directly to violence against your friends and yourself This is the same tired illogic that's been around for decades that's been demonstrably proven false. "Violent video games, violent music, violent words, etc. directly leads to violence!" >it would still be a slur since 99.9999% of gay people would say it was. Doesn't matter because in this community it's not a slur, as proven above. QED.
        solosoyokaze 5y ago
        Your argument rests on 4chan not existing the real world. Your entire premise is faulty, because it does. "Fag" is a slur on planet earth (where the 4chan users reside). There's no argument beyond that.
        5y ago

throwaway0xa 5y ago

>Your case to freely be racist with no repercussions is unconvincing. Stop strawmaning and shifting the goal posts because you've been proven wrong. We're not talking about racism in our thread here. >4chan’s cover story doesn’t matter It's not a "cover story", it's logically what's happening. >You’re literally arguing to use slurs. Wrong, they're not slurs. Just checked the dictionary, and "Archfag" is not listed as a slur. Neither is "oldfag" or "summerfag". Now you're literally arguing delusions that you've created that are nonsensical.

solosoyokaze 5y ago
“Fag” is most definitely a slur. A slur you’re arguing it’s ok to use.
- throwaway0xa 5y ago
  >“Fag” is most definitely a slur. No one is being called a "fag" though. >A slur you’re arguing it’s ok to use. I've successfully argued that "Archfag", "oldfag", etc. are not slurs, and are therefore OK to use. QED.
  - solosoyokaze 5y ago
    You’ve successfully exposed yourself as homophobic. QED
    - throwaway0xa 5y ago
      > You’ve successfully exposed yourself as homophobic. More delusions from you, not that I'm surprised. I am homosexual and fully support homosexuality. It is logically impossible for me to be homosexual. QED. You've successfully exposed yourself as delusional here after getting owned. I won.
      - solosoyokaze 5y ago
        I don't believe you, but for the sake of argument, if you were actually a gay person that somehow bonked your head and scrambled your brains to the point where you thought it was a good idea for white supremacists to use a slur that leads directly to violence against your friends and yourself, it would still be a slur since 99.9999% of gay people would say it was.
        throwaway0xa 5y ago
        >I don't believe you There's that delusion again! >if you were actually a gay person that somehow bonked your head and scrambled your brains Now you're IMAX-level projecting about being delusional and deranged. >white supremacists to use a slur For the fifth time, it's not a slur, and stop moving the goal posts and building straw men. >that leads directly to violence against your friends and yourself This is the same tired illogic that's been around for decades that's been demonstrably proven false. "Violent video games, violent music, violent words, etc. directly leads to violence!" >it would still be a slur since 99.9999% of gay people would say it was. Doesn't matter because in this community it's not a slur, as proven above. QED.
        solosoyokaze 5y ago
        Your argument rests on 4chan not existing the real world. Your entire premise is faulty, because it does. "Fag" is a slur on planet earth (where the 4chan users reside). There's no argument beyond that.
        5y ago