solenoid0937

5 ms·

1.
by solenoid0937 5d ago
You can't notice a bright blinking light on someone's face?
2.
by solenoid0937 5d ago
Every phone on the planet does this by default today. I don't see the delta between these glasses and someone taking a picture with their Pixel.
3.
by solenoid0937 5d ago
Yes, your comment was incorrect. What exactly is your threat model? "It is possible to work around" every single security control that has ever existed. Saying it "is possible" to work around a control is an utterly mean
4.
by solenoid0937 5d ago
There's a bright blinking light on my face telling them they're being recorded - and they have their phones out and are recording anyways! There are a lot of assumptions baked into your comment. What's with HN becoming so sat
5.
by solenoid0937 5d ago
These glasses are amazing for capturing memories on vacations, way nicer than using my phone camera.
6.
by solenoid0937 5d ago
The LED is active when you are using the camera. It's hardwired.
7.
by solenoid0937 5d ago
Seeing these reactionary Reddit-like takes on HN sucks. No, it's not easy for the average person to disable the camera on these glasses. They do continuously make it harder to do so. At this point anyone interested in spy glasses is be
8.
by solenoid0937 8d ago
It's not my job to re explain AI safety from scratch to every uninformed take on the internet. Authority serves a useful purpose. Having humility and delegating a topic to people that understand the topic better than you is not a bad t
9.
by solenoid0937 8d ago
Yes, I wonder who the clowns are: 1. Researchers that have forgotten more about this technology than the average HNer will ever learn 2. Random HNers that think that suddenly they understand the problem better than researchers that have spe
10.
by solenoid0937 10d ago
Ask a 6 year old to draw a chess board from scratch every turn and they too will make mistakes.
11.
by solenoid0937 10d ago
I wonder how much life DeepMind has left in it, especially after Hassabis's departure. Google execs must be having discussions about simply throwing their weight behind Anthropic since they already own so much of the company.
12.
by solenoid0937 10d ago
Presumably you would only do this for images you plan on sharing to social media anyways, to prove that it's not AI generated. PCC is quite good, about as close to private remote compute we can get without doing HME.
13.
by solenoid0937 10d ago
There really isn't. All sorts of people call themselves EA. For some self proclaimed EA, the development of superintelligence is indeed potentially apocalyptic, so they devote their money/time to making it arrive safely. This is b
14.
by solenoid0937 10d ago
The article has shockingly bad reasoning driven by a clear desire to drive home a point (that AI safety doesn't matter/is a marketing exercise), as opposed to observing the evidence first and reasoning about it. I'm kind of s
15.
by solenoid0937 10d ago
It's impossible for the typical HN cynic/conspiracy theorist.
16.
by solenoid0937 10d ago
"It's just marketing!!!" I yell as my family is turned into grey goo. "Nothing ever happens! None of this is real!"
17.
by solenoid0937 10d ago
Irregular is not an "effective altruist" firm, it's just another shitty cybersecurity firm, and this article is written by someone with a clear bias against "effective altruists" while not even understanding the ter
18.
by solenoid0937 12d ago
Just let the model cook. All of these weird tricks hurt frontier models
19.
by solenoid0937 13d ago
"AI diversity" does nothing when AIs can attack at incredible speed, when compute imbalances exist, etc
20.
by solenoid0937 13d ago
"Don't you understand?! It's all a marketing exercise!" I yell as grey goo consumes me and my family.
21.
by solenoid0937 13d ago
I dunno, being a Culture Mind sounds pretty damn good. Or even just a death-optional citizen in the Culture.
22.
by solenoid0937 15d ago
Irrelevant when they say they're competitive with Fable and Astra. They don't get to then roll that back and then say "but we have less compute!" You're either competitive or not.
23.
by solenoid0937 16d ago
> in this case too they didn't actually have the solution Given the size and recall of the biggest models, it's not unreasonable to assume that a single pertinent conversation would make it into the training data. I would almos
24.
by solenoid0937 18d ago
Exactly. It is common knowledge that all the AI companies have terrible margins. IMO tokens are the cheapest they'll ever be as these companies compete for users.
25.
by solenoid0937 19d ago
Aware that the rug will be pulled. The market runs at a loss
26.
by solenoid0937 19d ago
They'll get through it. You don't just halt progress because the transition will be rough. We'd be pre-industrial if we thought like this.
27.
by solenoid0937 19d ago
That's happening anyways, they don't need more organic data for that. Also, who cares? Such is the price of progress, I'm not selfish enough to hold humanity back because "muh job"
28.
by solenoid0937 19d ago
I hope everyone recognized the cheap tokens as a transparent ploy to gain more users before jacking up prices. This was obvious from day one.
29.
by solenoid0937 19d ago
lmao, PR description says: > Fixes a number of small issues picked up during LLM scans
30.
by solenoid0937 19d ago
Very easy to download abliterated GLM 5.3 and start doing bad things with it, and it'll be easier when Astra-level variants are available Just because you don't do a bad thing doesn't mean other people won't. It's w

More ›