solenoid0937

5 ms·

31.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
> State actors, professional criminals will have same or better capabilities State actors do but they are not unhinged enough to use this to cause massive loss of life, unlike random crazy people with access to a computer. Professional c
32.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
You absolutely can have (C) without widespread (A), you just need to limit the audience that gets the tools, and in fact the big labs are already engaging in (C) in collaboration with the government and vendors of critical software. That yo
33.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
Did you know (C) is possible without causing mass chaos that results in many people dying? In ways that don't give every script kiddie access to (A, B)? It turns out you can give defenders the opportunity to front-run, at least on the
34.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
Yes, I'm aware that the HN majority is a hyper-libertarian echo chamber that loves to outsource the problem of "technology hurting regular people" if it means they get to keep their toys/investments. After all, who cares
35.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
Meaningless phrase used to dismiss arguments, please engage with the actual argument. I don't think you understand how bad it will be if anyone has a button that can hack anything, our infrastructure is not ready for this. Actual peo
36.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
HuggingFace had no interest in squeezing a few million dollars out of OpenAI in the midst of being acquired by Nvidia. The optics are bad for HF as well because they gladly host abliterated models with safety training removed. When Astra&#x
37.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
The support of OSS models on HN just days after finding out about the message board incident is so bizarre to me. Do you guys really not comprehend the impact of giving every script kiddie an Astra-equivalent model to play with, this time w
38.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
> Change the law There is a huge gulf between what the law allows, and what being a decent person requires, and that gulf is called "being a scumbag." We should not alter the law to prohibit everything in that gulf, because i
39.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
Let's take the latest blog post from Anthropic on how their models hacked companies. What exactly comes off as "bragging?" How were the RSPs not upheld? I'm reading their Aug 2026 Risk Report and nothing indicates malfea
40.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
It's a few hundred tokens. If you are worried about a few hundred tokens you are in trouble, forget about "infinite money."
41.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
Not enough people blame VCs and the people that fund evil things. They are accessories. They knew this would happen, let's not pretend they didn't. They are just shameless because making money has been canonized as a greater moral
42.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
My code being correct 99% of the and costing 5x more tokens is vastly preferable to my code only being correct 90% of the time and using fewer tokens.
43.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
> At some point, the leading labs must change their development practices What indicates that this has not been done?
44.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
(c) there are so many undiscovered vulnerabilities that it doesn't make sense for them to offer a decent payout
45.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
So this is just delegating certain work to dumber models? I certainly wouldn't use Gemini 2.5 Flash (!!?) for code writing as suggested. I've never had an issue with Codex or Claude reading massive files, they're really good
46.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
> yet they are also responsible for the highest profile misalignment incidents so far They are the only ones posting about them or admitting to them. That does not mean "the most misalignment incidents so far." You don't k
47.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
> before then deciding to release it to the public. You mean, with safeguards that block the dangerous things? Safeguards so aggressive that the public complains about them?
48.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
> are dishonest, sociopathic, and the very source of the danger Source?
49.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
Very obvious from votes, comments on the topic over the past few months.
50.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
They fixed the safeguards last week
51.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
Meaningless "big corpo bad" statement, Anthropic at least has sacrificed a good amount of market cap for safety with DoW. OpenAI paused RL for two weeks.
52.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
Obvious shorthand for referring to "the majority of users on HackerNews."
53.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
Wild that you are downvoted so much. The HN majority and the VC crowd has been negligently complicit in downplaying AI safety, writing off Anthropic's statements as "hysteria" or "marketing", etc. Now this capabil
54.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
You aren't understanding this at all. The frontier labs have hundreds of the best people in the world working on safety and alignment. They care deeply. What happens when some random Chinese open source model, distilled on Astra, gets
55.
by solenoid0937 1mo ago
Hilarious for HN to suddenly realize that AI safety and alignment might matter. You can lead a horse to water...
56.
by solenoid0937 2mo ago
It's probably just that the voice models are the same underlying model being served with a different system prompt and with thinking turned off.
57.
by solenoid0937 2mo ago
One day HN will learn that benchmarks aren't everything! Fable 5 was way better than Opus 5 for anyone that used it.
58.
by solenoid0937 2mo ago
These comparisons are meaningless I use Opus every day and easily have most of my weekly limit left over at the end of the week
59.
by solenoid0937 2mo ago
You think moving will help you? OpenAI is going to do exactly the same thing soon. Unless you're moving off the frontier entirely, that is.
60.
by solenoid0937 2mo ago
The safety filter is simply no longer an issue.

More ›