3 ms·
Seeing these reactionary Reddit-like takes on HN sucks. No, it's not easy for the average person to disable the camera on these glasses. They do continuously ma
by solenoid0937 14d ago
Seeing these reactionary Reddit-like takes on HN sucks. No, it's not easy for the average person to disable the camera on these glasses. They do continuously make it harder to do so. At this point anyone interested in spy glasses is better off buying one of the many other glasses with cameras in it.
- knowaveragejoe 14d agoPeople would generally oppose all such devices if they had a real picture of what's going on.
- magicalist 14d agoAlternatively, sounds like you're a user of the glasses and don't like what these comments might reflect on you if more people agree with them? Was my comment incorrect? You admit it's both possible to work around it, people are actually doing that, and the comment does indeed give themselves a little pat on the back for working hard to unsuccessfully solve a problem with the product they themselves choose to make and market? So what's the reactionary part?
- solenoid0937 14d agoYes, your comment was incorrect. What exactly is your threat model? "It is possible to work around" every single security control that has ever existed. Saying it "is possible" to work around a control is an utterly meaningless statement. At what budget? With what skill level? With what frequency and likelihood? If the intent is to deter the typical weirdos that would try to disable the blinking light, then yes, their mitigations have been extraordinarily effective and most of these weirdos now just buy other cheaper and more discreet camera glasses.
- cubefox 14d ago> Alternatively, sounds like you're a user of the glasses and don't like what these comments might reflect on you if more people agree with them? No it doesn't sound like that!