Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sockaddr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
121.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
I suspect a new class of spam is emerging that is strategically placed positively or negatively sentimented text that is designed to be ingested by other LLMs about a certain topic. This spam doesn't need to be convincing to humans, ju
122.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
Perhaps the problem is that people don’t want the messages? The thing I dread most about LinkedIn is the constant low effort spam and that LinkedIn basically promotes in my inbox.
123.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
On the surface it sounds good. But imagine regulatory capture of this mechanism, now corporate interests could weaponize it to prevent products of competing companies from even being authorized.
124.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
> I just gave it a screenshot of yesterday's meals pulled from MyFitnessPal, told it to respond ONLY in JSON, and to calculate the macro nutrient profile of the screenshot > Not impressed This made me chuckle Just a bit ago this
125.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
> Then I wonder if, in a sense, kids are like drugs Oh yes. Very much like the brain slugs in Futurama > and for the same reason just like you I think that you shouldn't have kids if you want to chase immortality. Yes. However ha
126.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
Bob [1], is that you? [1]: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/32109569-we-are-legion-w...
127.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
It's not dumb. It's a feeling that I share. However even if the technological hurdles are overcome I'm not sure I'd remain viable after learning that my loved ones (and especially children) are long gone if they couldn&#
128.
▲
Galactic algorithm
(en.wikipedia.org)
123 points
by
sockaddr
3y ago
|
25 comments
129.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
I would
130.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
I suspect it isn't political but rather that being a journalist in Israel is safer than being a journalist in Syria. So naturally one will be represented more than the other. No politics there.
131.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
Agreed. I think something like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dD_NdnYrDzY would work well.
132.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
That assumes they have a tit for our tat.
133.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
Now I won't be able to stop thinking about that too. It is an interesting way to frame that idea.
134.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
Exactly. It's such a pain in the ass to contribute knowledge there that I just don't even bother trying anymore. It's a collection of petty tyrants at this point. I can't wait for LLMs to just digest them whole.
135.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
What is this referring to? I can't understand any of this.
136.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
Your comment is funny to me and I agree. It reminds me of the "Can LLMs think?" comments. Now I'm left wondering what other "classes of reasoning" are impossible for corporate entities, what they may be blind to sim
137.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
Yup. I often will read something like "A connection between X and Y" Then skim down to the conclusion and it will say "In conclusion, we were only able to see some weak connection and we aren't sure if it was one at all,
138.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
Probably because (1) The average apple card user is too savvy to need to pay any balance interest to them. (2) No stupid "earn points for the things you love" bullshit games. (3) apple isn't providing the card supplier any wa
139.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
From my perspective he's putting in the work to collect all of these into one spot that is easy and fun for me to peruse (also without banner ads and other garbage on the site). That seems sufficiently transformative to make his referr
140.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
I LOVE his content, super knowledgeable, friendly to guests, interesting topics, good production quality, everything. But I have one question: Does he ever stop to breathe when he talks?
141.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
I think things are more competitive and fast-paced nowadays than when we entered this space and so history and all of the details that come along with it aren't necessarily their first priority. I don't blame them. For example, Wh
142.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
All of the pre-2000 Nissans my family have owned or that my friends have owned seemed to be pretty decent (I loved my 1996 sentra). I'm really only referring to some vague date shortly after 2000 where quality took a nosedive. Not sure
143.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
I too have a "living" library haha
144.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
My family has owned many Nissans and Infinitis and they are (in the last 15+ years) universally garbage. Nissan makes trash that can drive around for a little bit first, that's what this is. CVTs are kind of crappy to begin with but Ni
145.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
> You should develop your own video editor and share it with the community Seems like a fun weekend project
146.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
Yup. On paper you'd almost have to be an idiot to pick something other than a tesla however the reality of its performance doesn't match what they claim. I'm in the market for another car and I periodically compare something
147.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
Not a dumb question. My car slightly predates FSD. The behavioral issues were a result of: - Enhanced Autopilot $5000 option that I can't get a refund for - Emergency auto-braking (has to be manually disabled for each trip) I commente
148.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
As a current tesla owner I couldn't have said it better. There have been multiple instances over the years where my car would make completely inappropriate and dangerous decisions (like slamming on the brakes on the interstate or in a
149.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
Yeah and I'm surprised at the lack of "exit from parenthood" it's an exit that I dread even though I've just begun the journey. It seems like a poorly thought out piece to have skipped one of the core human experien
150.
▲
by
sockaddr
3y ago
They’re deliberately being a petty asshole about it (that part isn’t good) but the end result is actually probably better for your brain so I’m fine with the pettiness.
More ›