Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
searine
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
53 ms
·
541.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
Part time PhD is interesting but probably very challenging. He seems to have completed it in 5-6 years, which is average for full-time PhD students, so my question is what got left out? His google scholar lists a conference abstract, and hi
542.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
Classics. I think I have a subtle preference for Alberts, rather than Lodish in terms of text, but I think the Lodish illustrations are better. At this point I think I have three copies of Alberts stashed in various closets and trunks.
543.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
> if you are pulled over, you roll down your window, keep your hands on the steering wheel, look straight and answer "yes sir", "no sir". This is just common courtesy? I've always acted this way, and never had ba
544.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
Relative. People are eating kilograms of meat a week, and colon cancer is far from the leading cause of death. Remember dosage is important!
545.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
>roundup is synonymous with glyphosate For all intents and purposes, it is. > yet through further reading I discovered that approximately half of it is glyphosate, and the rest is a combination of surfactants and whatever else. This i
546.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
>So ... are you saying glyphosate is known to be mutagenic and likely to cause cancers or that the common understanding on cooked meats is wrong. I'm saying that glyphosate is probably less carcinogenic considering it has less evide
547.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
>surfactants were safe, Safe when used properly. >safe to drink even. Never said that.
548.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
> Meanwhile /u/searine is a well-known reddit mod for /r/GMO You flatter me. But seriously. Stop by https://www.reddit.com/r/gmo . We actually try to be very inclusive of all opinions. So few peo
549.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
> to show that their assertions come from a biased perspective that requires examination. But you didn't show it. You assumed it, based on their race.
550.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
See the following review : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15862083 "There is insufficient evidence to conclude that glyphosate preparations containing POEA are more toxic than those containing alternative surf
551.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
This is an excellent point. So many people forget about the human costs of agriculture.
552.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
See the following review : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15862083 "There is insufficient evidence to conclude that glyphosate preparations containing POEA are more toxic than those containing alternative surf
553.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
They don't have evidence that glyphosate is a carcinogen. They are using general classifications to infer potential harm. Glyphosate is in the same class as cooked meat. This is also likely political posturing to appease anti-gmo senti
554.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
I agree, it's an argument to authority. I provide links elsewhere in the thread though.
555.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
>Do you have any facts to back up your claims? Because it is the widely publicized scientific consensus. But if you insist. EFSA : http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/4302 EPA: https://
556.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
> you haven't provided any links to substantiate your dismissals Because it is the widely publicized scientific consensus. But if you insist. EFSA : http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/4302 E
557.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
I agree. The primary component of that "Other Chemicals" are surfactants. Surfactants, such as (POEA used in roundup) are known skin irritants. They are used to help absorption of glyphosate in plants. Skin irritation is a very we
558.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
I agree, so why be concerned with ppb of rigorously studied chemicals shown time and again to be safe (quack-science excluded)? Your daily coffee is probably an order of magnitude more carcinogenic than any glyphosate/roundup exposure.
559.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
>Regardless, Roundup is not safe. PROVE IT. All studies thus far point to roundup/glyphosate being incredibly safe. Far safer than any alternative, including many "natural" ones. The LD50 for glyphosate is like a fucking k
560.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
Bad news buddy. Everything is made of chemicals.
561.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
Bunk. > But mounting evidence, including one study published in February The article boldly cites a paper by Gilles-Eric Séralini for "evidence" of roundup causing cancer. Seralini is a known fraud who has had multiple papers r
562.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
>it seems reasonable to assume that mcphage is a white male Being racist might seem reasonable, but it is not constructive because you use it to ignore the content of the poster's argument. Even if the content of the poster's a
563.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
>And yet, he is a white male. It's a mindset problem where you project your experiences on everyone else. Invalidating someones argument/opinion based on race/sex, is racist/sexist. Your argument also assumes "ba
564.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
>Let me guess: you're a white male, aren't you? This is an extremely shitty and racist argument to make, particularly on the internet where you shouldn't make assumptions about who people are. Were the cops wrong in being
565.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
Cheap food isn't necessarily bad food. Luxury food isn't necessarily good food. No matter the political climate, or income inequality. People need to eat. The idea of cheap food is to completely remove it from the spectrum of poli
566.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
>Unless you're eating a ridiculous amount of chicken at every meal, which you probably shouldn't, the cost of chicken could be higher if it means better working conditions and humane treatment of the animal. This is a privilege
567.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
>Panopticon Good lord what a cliche name.
568.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
> Keep an anonymous public database Due to the nature of genetic information, it can never be really anonymous if you are genotyping genome size amounts of host DNA. There is simply too much data to anonymize it's provenance. Microb
569.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
Oh my god. We've reached peak smugness. Close it down boys. HN is over. No more fun.
570.
▲
by
searine
10y ago
>I've come across it in a few other contexts and I take it like a football chant. Finally, someone who fucking gets it. HN is such a Mecca of sperglords that the can't even understand a sports chant.
More ›