sanxiyn

13 ms·

211.
by sanxiyn 2y ago
> including implementing the capability to promptly enact a full shutdown So you need to be able to turn it off. It should be easy? Still it seems to be a good thing to make sure you can turn it off.
212.
by sanxiyn 2y ago
As I understand this law does not mandate you to ensure anything. It requires you to follow best practices (to be determined), report safety incidents, etc. You are not even liable for safety incidents, you just need to report them, althoug
213.
by sanxiyn 2y ago
I disagree on "Focus on Usage, Not Development". > Regulate the use of AI in high-risk areas such as healthcare, criminal justice, and critical infrastructure, where the potential for harm is greatest This suggests, for example
214.
by sanxiyn 2y ago
See "DOS-73 Technical Reference" on the linked page for details. Yes, DOS-73 expansion cards had 8086 CPUs.
215.
by sanxiyn 2y ago
It is not handing over. It is selling for a price. I think there IS a price that ByteDance would sell.
216.
by sanxiyn 2y ago
Yes, see https://github.com/blas-lapack-rs .
217.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
Apparently Computer History Museum has one, catalog number 102766595, "Gift of Stan Honey". Stan Honey founded Etak. https://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/10276659...
218.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
Nucor exists. US Steel is not #1, even in US.
219.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
I think the critical difference is that Japan is an ally and China is not.
220.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
Falcon also released open dataset.
221.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
Databricks (who also participated in OLMo, it's probably the same codebase) trained on AMD before, see 2023 post https://www.databricks.com/blog/amd-mi250 . It was probably seamless, as any issues were fixed by Dat
222.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
The best option is to use GPL.
223.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
WebAssembly is used in the real world and uses are very diverse. I recommend "An Empirical Study of Real-World WebAssembly Binaries". (The paper is from 2021, and it would be great to get an update, but I guess academia does not r
224.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
The article uses LLVM Flang from LLVM 18.1.1. pklausler's point is that it is counterproductive and LLVM HEAD should be used instead.
225.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
Why so late? I think WebKit had this like five years ago, aka Gigacage.
226.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
I am aware of this paper from National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w31161
227.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
If you don't want to be leeched, don't contribute to BSD licensed projects.
228.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
AWS and Google contributed those under BSD license , being fully informed that Redis Ltd can commercialize like this. It makes perfect sense for AWS and Google to fork immediately after the switch, but for contributions before the switch,
229.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
Why do you think "bubble" will burst?
230.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
Checking for Linux makes sense. Doing the exact same check for Linux five times in a row is mysterious.
231.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
> The first difference is that the script makes sure (very sure!) to exit if not being run on Linux. The repeated check is indeed mysterious. My only hypothesis is that the attacker may have thought that it should look plausible as a tes
232.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
For this reason, maintaining GCC 4.7 is one of long-term high-impact projects of Bootstrappable Builds project. https://bootstrappable.org/projects.html
233.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
Interestingly, The Amsterdam Compiler Kit is now open source. https://tack.sourceforge.net/
234.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
In 2009, 4 million lines of COBOL were migrated to Java using an automatic translator. https://www.infoq.com/news/2009/07/cobol-to-java/
235.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
Considering MTOB(Machine Translation from One Book) result, where LLM in-context learns a new language from a grammar book, I wonder how LLMs fare given, say, GnuCOBOL Programmer's Guide PDF, which is easily available. It would be an i
236.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
u64 overflows at 16 exabytes, so it sounds plausible. Cool story.
237.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
100% this. I see neither legal nor moral problems.
238.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
> And they lose little by providing those changes to others. I am unsure about this. Some Linux patches can be of high value, say better TCP congestion control. By releasing such patches, others can get them for free while it took you si
239.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
I agree. People seem to be angry that the project which received contributions under BSD changed to the project licensed under SSPL, but this is explicitly what you are doing when you contribute to BSD projects and all contributors should h
240.
by sanxiyn 3y ago
https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10429 found that people are overweighting Wikipedia and downweighting Wikipedia improves things across the board INCLUDING PREDICTING NEXT TOKEN ON WIKIPEDIA, which is frankly amazing.

More ›