4 ms·
> including implementing the capability to promptly enact a full shutdown So you need to be able to turn it off. It should be easy? Still it seems to be a good
by sanxiyn 2y ago
> including implementing the capability to promptly enact a full shutdown
So you need to be able to turn it off. It should be easy? Still it seems to be a good thing to make sure you can turn it off.
- jpollock 2y agoPeople saying “no, you can’t do that” is why open source software exists.
- Dig1t 2y ago>until that covered model is the subject of a limited duty exemption. The second half of that sentence clarifies. It's not that you have to be able to shut down the model, everyone knows it's trivial to turn off a computer. It's that the government can force you to shut down your program until such time as they give you regulatory approval to turn it back on again.
- michaelmrose 2y agoSo require a backdoor to shut down software running on someone else's hardware you mean? Doesn't this inherently break normal distribution of source code which inherently doesn't come with an off switch?
- Kim_Bruning 2y agoHow exactly? If it's floss software, everyone has their own copy. If there's a million people who downloaded my model weights, do I get to phone them up and ask politely? ;-)