sandeepkd

7 ms·

91.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
May be surprise for Author and the people that the Author reached out.
92.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
Per user encryption key ties it with the user session (assuming you do authentication properly), no one else can access it. User being able to see the information is not really an attack vector in this case. The compliance rules at times ar
93.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
Yes, this storage would be growing exponentially making the disk space and latency problems harder (add the disaster recovery/backups). I think the choice of using client side is not too bad if you ensure that its secured properly. Al
94.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
I believe its a result of chasing the speed and happy path. The intent was to make the data available for reuse on the backend side for the same user session, it kind of makes sense. Making it available across the models is most likely by d
95.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
From sources, its not surprising cause lot of people within the company knew about it already: 1. Managers were asked to provide mid year rating for their reports, this is not something that happens otherwise 2. Managers were asked to mark
96.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
You pay the lawyer in thousands to use a language which meets the criteria for the patent. Thousands of software patents are repetition of each other with some thing in particular worded differently
97.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
My understanding so far is that as humans we get bounded by our emotions, morals, incentives and fears. On the other hand you are competing against capitalism that tries to use any possible means to make profits. It treads along every possi
98.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
Its never a simple thing to say no, it does comes down the personality for sure, however what matters is 1. Who are you saying NO to - Ideally what you are saying NO to should have mattered more however in real world incentives and repercus
99.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
Comes down to type of items, when you have physical inventory the number is limited so more manageable and interestingly enough the problem only applies to physical inventory. You are just spending some more disk space to avoid synchronizat
100.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
The moment you added a background process you just replaced the complexity. 1. Backgrounds process can back up 2. They need context of the user and need to switch context per user 3. What if they fail, you create some DLQ or another process
101.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
Here is the fun part, the same companies invests millions of dollars to protect its infrastructure and services from scrapers/bots AND they also invest millions of dollars to circumvent the bots, captchas and rate limits. Unfortunately
102.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
You need to account for the fact that a lot of scraping is delegated by the big players to smaller players who can take loss of reputation and can use questionable methods (residential IPs). Some of the scrapers from these AI companies have
103.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
I am bit puzzled, read through the RFC itself ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc10023/ ) but could not find who is going to use it and why?
104.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
Going through their harness (codex, claude) is subscription (app use) which is heavily? subsidized. Anyone using the enterprise plan are charged the API pricing, however the article is not clear if Databricks is using enterprise plan or not
105.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
I find this funny and interesting at some levels 1. Codex, Claude and others try to switch models being used at their level itself to manage the cost and outcomes 2. Now company like data bricks develops one more layer on the top of it to d
106.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
I understand the legal terminology is different, however at the same time I am not entirely sure if the optics change by calling it Settlement or Penalty. There is only one party paying money here and they are not getting any service after
107.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB10922 There is this old one around contents like images and all, the ripple affect is pretty much everywhere. Its sort of coupled with the recent penalty of $1.5B on Anthropic. T
108.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
Way too much rides on Java, pretty much every big business has their own customized version of JDK that they support and maintain
109.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
I believe thats the real reason, its not just Oracle, it would eventually be everyone in this kind of boat. No business would publicly use (or claim) AI to write code with recent verdict over the IP rights of AI generated code. It would be
110.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
The thesis is covering the flat scenarios mostly. I think the scenario where the job is done so poorly that the steak has to be thrown away needs to be included as well. At times the pans would get damaged. And eventually the business is in
111.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
> emphasized that “Frontier models really like to cheat, and the reason they like to cheat is because often during training, there’s different types of pressure on them to work fast, or work efficiently.” They realize, he explained, is i
112.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
I think this is very critical concept and existing gap which does not makes into AI conversations. Interestingly enough a lot of Si Fi movies have captured this where the AI starts to feel and have "thoughts". Have to give kudos t
113.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
Not sure if I am the only one feeling this way, but what problem is being solved with this?
114.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
This is really a great article from implementation perspective and the challenges associated with it. The OP already captured the reasons. Even though the reason 1 has been mentioned it did not go deep into it and somehow focussed a lot mor
115.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
The concept of MVP has been there for a while, it felt deceptive too and incurred lot of tech debt. However one would feel the deception only if they understand the missing details. For a lot of roles making decisions it benefits them to ig
116.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
Good for awareness but its not Novel at all. Its an incomplete, sensational and one sided PR by a given company 1. There is nothing novel about this, its a known behavior and has been in public domain for a while 2. The article talks about
117.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
> Track the lifecycle, not the purchase. In my experience this is the core issue with security. It has to be a continuous process in reality but its hard to justify the cost and resource allocation. For this reason it ends up being a poi
118.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
In reality FedRAMP has multiple variations, low, moderate, high, gives enough wiggle room to companies on what they can do when. Other good thing about government is that its quite flexible when needed. There is always exists a path to over
119.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
From the patterns I have seen people would tend to use the time to build demo's using AI instead of design and then have a back and forth on the demo itself. One has to consider the fact that demo's look more convincing/compl
120.
by sandeepkd 2mo ago
> anti-poaching The term make it sounds like a good thing, however I do not know if this was really a net positive. It might have helped the companies but isn't this anti-competitive at the employee level?

More ›