sandeepkd

3 ms·

1.
by sandeepkd 5d ago
Its interesting, saying sorry for your mistakes using plain words does not have the same impact as saying it in a convincing manner as if you mean it. Giving them a 10 page long documentation and asking them to just acknowledge it as a part
2.
by sandeepkd 5d ago
Yes the driver made a poor decision in a situation that he was not trained for. However enrolling and onboarding the driver is a part of Uber's process. The situation may have been avoided if Uber had this strict clause in its onboardi
3.
by sandeepkd 5d ago
There is a lot more to it, an assumption is being made that somehow its easy to classify a company being god or bad and same for people. In reality, everyones life experiences shape them differently, the moral compass of right and wrong is
4.
by sandeepkd 5d ago
Naming couple companies that you acquired for whom you changed the trajectory would be a lot stronger signal without revealing your identity. On side note, its rare to see anyone fixing the old tech, its hard to fix, needs a different kind
5.
by sandeepkd 5d ago
The positive argument about PE adding value is around efficiency of processes and scale. Interest rates can make a difference however in reality I doubt that it effects the outcome in most cases. Companies have already invested in staff wi
6.
by sandeepkd 5d ago
May be categorizing the different private equities can be helpful here. A PE interested and invested for growth is always the best outcome. A PE only looking to salvage and squeeze is that gives the bad branding to PE.
7.
by sandeepkd 5d ago
A structure to run business efficiently using practiced methods is always a good thing. However from what little I have understood, the goal of Private Equity is to maximize the dollar value on their investment. Somehow they have settled wi
8.
by sandeepkd 7d ago
Was not able to find any mention of AI or LLM usage on the article. The article is very detailed and goes in depth about how they have been able to do it. If anything it just shows the database level expertise and understanding of the exist
9.
by sandeepkd 7d ago
An executive at this level is not going to risk their personal political capital to make such statements unless its part of plan and thought through. They might be right but in capitalistic system no company would given them a opportunity a
10.
by sandeepkd 7d ago
Either way, a change did happen, financial impact aside this change is definitely going to disrupt the ecosystem as a whole which is a much bigger unknown at this point. > A huge chunk of the content that was scraped was most likely prov
11.
by sandeepkd 7d ago
I really wonder if anyone installs it on their machine. May be I am one off but I am Hearing about this for first time, don't recognize any of their partners.
12.
by sandeepkd 7d ago
Though I agree with the detailed differentiation, still for the headline purpose a generic one that resonates with people easily isn't a bad choice
13.
by sandeepkd 8d ago
I guess it really depends on how one choses to define general public, probably an assumption has been made that everyone has their own personal device. > Built-in password managers are great for this. But they’re not universal (e.g. I be
14.
by sandeepkd 8d ago
I think this is the biggest reason why these category of discussion happens in the first place, there is a gap between what technology is good for, whats its ideal for and then the products motivation to push it on to the user assuming it w
15.
by sandeepkd 8d ago
I get a feeling of dejavu for this one. Most of my experience has been in Java and in most places I worked in the past we had this hierarchy of exception classification which gets reflected into the http status codes as well. On high level
16.
by sandeepkd 8d ago
There was something I was hoping to find in the article, which is this common situation where employees are also the customer of their companies product, they happen to have elevated privileges and yet the credential rules applicable to tho
17.
by sandeepkd 9d ago
There is discussion and then there is argument. Discussion is more about sharing and learning where as argument becomes all about proving a point, specifically individuals targeted point of view. My observation is generic and more about sta
18.
by sandeepkd 9d ago
It wasn't the Github that was compromised, it was the access to their private repository that was compromised so somewhere down the line the security best practices are in question for sure. Self hosted repos available on public intern
19.
by sandeepkd 9d ago
Any company where understanding of security practices has a direct impact on its revenue from early phases can be considered as a security company in my view. From what I have seen a large chunk of internet exists and stands on the shoulder
20.
by sandeepkd 9d ago
More like you have 60 requests, you can exhaust them in a single second or spread them differently as per your choice.
21.
by sandeepkd 9d ago
On the funny side, reading the website tagline, apparently they claim to know who is attacking you, they just happen to miss out on who attacked them. Turns out they are not really a security company, just an aggregator of bad IPs. Ideally
22.
by sandeepkd 9d ago
I had the similar feelings, the setup is biased for certain outcomes it feels. At times I feel like that I am in an eternal questioning mode but then again I find it to be a better choice to be critical and skeptical for technology related
23.
by sandeepkd 9d ago
Harness and benchmark for the harness feels like a chicken and egg problem. The harness is to optimize the interaction results with the models. Any benchmark for harness has to focus on the goals that the harness was trying to optimize for
24.
by sandeepkd 9d ago
Wonder if you have any source to back that data, unless you are referring to the security code to detect the user and their usage itself to prevent against unauthorized usage patterns?
25.
by sandeepkd 9d ago
The devil is always in the details. Somehow I feel that when we offload the responsibility to some one else we get this feeling that the other person/entity would be doing full diligence and whatever else is required to carry out the j
26.
by sandeepkd 10d ago
Not sure if some one already mentioned, these numbers are rarely for general public 1. These are core to the (service level agreements) SLA's for the enterprise companies when they evaluate and sign the contract (must for government RF
27.
by sandeepkd 11d ago
This sounds interesting and twisted in some sense 1. A start up is validating a service provider to ensure that they are secure enough so that they can trust them before signing up for their service 2. The service provider is already truste
28.
by sandeepkd 11d ago
Its unfortunate that the security requirements are expected from the for-profit businesses when the cost of paying penalties for breach of security is way lower than actually implementing the security. Ironically in case of breach they just
29.
by sandeepkd 12d ago
Working on an opinionated identity provider from security and performance perspective (sort of next version of keycloak). My observation with existing products is that the security, performance and architecture aspect gets diluted and take
30.
by sandeepkd 12d ago
They have to check from their data store on the algo they scavenged for the clients, thats the whole idea about being correct instead of making a guess.

More ›