sabarn01

7 ms·

61.
by sabarn01 3y ago
They buried the lead. This is all really about Chevron doctrine which gives a large amount of deference to administrative agencies. The current court has indicated they might be willing to overturn Chevron which would mean rule making wou
62.
by sabarn01 3y ago
You are free to file suite.
63.
by sabarn01 3y ago
The 14th amendment.
64.
by sabarn01 3y ago
Sure but often these are levied by insiders to shut down outsiders. The long term problem with regulatory bodies is capture. Which is another reason that the core of this issue the Chevron doctrine is bad law. Regulator should be required
65.
by sabarn01 3y ago
This is framed in a very specific way. The real question is how much latitude administrative agencies should be given. Chevron says a lot and it says that they don't have to be consistent, nor do they have to even meet the plain meani
66.
by sabarn01 3y ago
Unless you run it yourself you don't know. They could run a modified version ect. You can't know and at some level you have to trust that they do what they say.
67.
by sabarn01 3y ago
How do you know they really run end to end encryption and are not lying.
68.
by sabarn01 3y ago
but its true for all organizations and people.
69.
by sabarn01 3y ago
I should have been more specific. We have lots a data classifications we maintain and we have different rules for different classifications. Customer content we can't access without customer consent. We are paid to store customer con
70.
by sabarn01 3y ago
I don't know if I can say what we have to turn over to the auditors that isn't in the public document. As to verifying the hardware we buy our hardware from other companies who have their own controls. If you dig far enough down e
71.
by sabarn01 3y ago
What exactly can an org do. We hire outside verifiers and then meet their standards.
72.
by sabarn01 3y ago
We collect telemetry about user actions and the successes of our service. All the data we collect is about how the service runs and we only look at it via aggregation. Internally we have training every year about what you can and can&#x27
73.
by sabarn01 3y ago
The document I linked explains how why and when. It also explains how we verify that and who does the verification. Also O365 customers have access to audit logs and the rest. At some level everything is about trust there is no way you can
74.
by sabarn01 3y ago
If you write a document and store it in sharepoint online we have to keep that data as does any online offering.
75.
by sabarn01 3y ago
Like telemetry? We have to collect customer data that's what we get paid for. As for pinky promises we are SOC compliant and externlly audited. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/compliance/regulatory/off
76.
by sabarn01 3y ago
You can get access with customer permission for a limited time window which is audited. In the normal course of business no.
77.
by sabarn01 3y ago
We have to certify every O365 service for all of these. We also have to certify all of our dependencies.
78.
by sabarn01 3y ago
We don't have access to that data internally. We can't access customer data outside performance metrics about the service. At least for the normal dev there is no real way to get access to what the customer does.
79.
by sabarn01 3y ago
Maybe not but the US has more resources more Spec Ops ect.
80.
by sabarn01 3y ago
No. There were multiple attempts to destroy Israel by force and the outcome is this. There are Israeli arabs with equal rights as Jews so this isn't the ethnic struggle it was in the US or sa. This is what do you do with a defeated ene
81.
by sabarn01 3y ago
That's a very different claim the US and south Africa integrated. The us over a period of 100 years. There are some land reforms in sa but there are none in the US. Also Israel has a native Arab population that is already integrated.
82.
by sabarn01 3y ago
They may have more bombs than they have manpower. It's about which resources you choose to expend. Also the is has far more precision weapons than anyone else.
83.
by sabarn01 3y ago
I think this is true to an extent. I certainly think the US given the same task would have been more surgical, but the US has a lot more money power and resources. Israel has to maintain a military so it can fend off attacks from its neig
84.
by sabarn01 3y ago
So your first step is destruction of the Jewish state. Why would Israel do that. If that's your opening gabit it seems like war is the only option.
85.
by sabarn01 3y ago
So what should Israel do as a concrete step. If your only answers is right of return you have an unworkable first step.
86.
by sabarn01 3y ago
What would you suggest Israel do if fighting hamas is not an option. Also the Nazis killed civilians as a goal not by happenstance.
87.
by sabarn01 3y ago
Right of return is a non starter for the winning power. Which is why this conflict is intractable.
88.
by sabarn01 3y ago
I think I agree with that. Which is the PA should be boosted and rewarded with increased freedom and autonomy as a counter example to Gaza. As it stands right now Israel is almost rewarding being more intransigent.
89.
by sabarn01 3y ago
Gaza has been pseudo self governed since 2005, and is ruled by an authoritarian theocratic regime. The situation was intolerable on 10/6 but understood. What exactly should israel do after the 10/7 attacks. To me attempting to d
90.
by sabarn01 3y ago
Jews were a majority of Jerusalem even in 1850. Some communities have existed since roman times. Its a complicated story that doesn't start within anyone's living memory.

More ›