3 ms·

You are free to file suite.

• beaeglebeached 3y ago
  This worked for the 15th when they had racist voting (took until year 2000 to fix). Ginsberg, showing her true pro racism colors, dissented in Rice v cayetano. The 14th for HHA would be a worthy case no doubt. That aside, previous CRA under 14/15 were struck, it didn't stick until expansion of commerce under wickard.