s9w

58 ms·

421.
by s9w 7y ago
> QT website is one big clusterfuck of corporate bullshit and hard to find stuff. They keep redesigning it and every year its getting worse and worse That captures my own impression accurately
422.
Sad state of cross platform GUI frameworks(blog.royalsloth.eu)
39 points by s9w 7y ago|27 comments
423.
by s9w 7y ago
That is a very high bar to prove and therefore a very low bar to implement these harsh measures. The measures themselves are inhuman too. I think we both weight our rights, the medical risk and economic danger differently but I can see your
424.
by s9w 7y ago
That way we agree. However if you have cancer or break your neck and have a positive test, you should not be counted as "died from covid" - yet you are.
425.
by s9w 7y ago
I should have elaborated, sorry. I'm actually trying to make the exact same point you are. People die, and there are sometimes various causes. In your case it was cardiac arrest that "masked" cancer or at least is only half o
426.
by s9w 7y ago
https://www.lehighvalleylive.com/coronavirus/2020/03/first-l...
427.
by s9w 7y ago
Why would you assume that? There was a comorbidity study from Italy that did not hint at that at all.
428.
by s9w 7y ago
No, this is the "with" number. The "from" number is unknown and is impossible to be larger.
429.
by s9w 7y ago
We know Italy counts "everyone". There was even a study done on comorbidities.
430.
by s9w 7y ago
But we don't know if covid19 was the main cause of death
431.
by s9w 7y ago
> I would not be surprised if fatalities overall remain flat What would be enough evidence in a month or two that you would agree that this was fantastically overblown? I fear that even after this is over, the numbers will be be same sam
432.
by s9w 7y ago
That is quite a claim
433.
by s9w 7y ago
Its a site that fakes being google while it is by extinction rebellion, one of the most vile group of people on the face of the earth
434.
by s9w 7y ago
How is it even possible that this is posted again? This was killed earlier for good reasons https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22746260
435.
by s9w 7y ago
This is a fake site by the lovely people (I would call them terrorists) of extinction rebellion, who by the way are currently very loudly cheering for the death of "old people"
436.
by s9w 7y ago
In Germany too. Every death plus Positive sars-cov-2 test == death "from" corona
437.
by s9w 7y ago
We simply don't have random testing in Germany yet. 0.1% is roughly the official number of positive test (of people who are sick enough to get tested).
438.
by s9w 7y ago
I can't follow along with that. We're in peace times.. banning people from going out of their home is something I would not have believed possible until russian tanks are at the gates of Berlin again, or the day of reckoning is co
439.
by s9w 7y ago
Fair enough. From what I make of this all we do not have strong enough data to really say this is as bad as we make it. We'll see in a month or two I guess when we can conclusively look at the total mortality.
440.
by s9w 7y ago
The age distribution is quite a signal that this is plausible. Then we have the Italian study that said only 1% had no other comorbidity. And then you have a few cases with enough details to go looking, usually the first death in a city&#x2
441.
by s9w 7y ago
How is that possible if every death is counted as corona death? Besides a missing test of course.
442.
by s9w 7y ago
The media should stop calling this death rate or corona deaths. These deaths are not (all) from the virus, rather occurred in people who died and had a positive test. These things can be (and I assume are) vastly different. Just as a thou
443.
by s9w 7y ago
The show is hard to defend, in particular if you cherish Star Trek of the past. It's the typical modern/Kurtzman Trek on steroids. The Story is a carbon copy of other things (exploding Moon/Star from Star Trek 6; Android arc,
444.
by s9w 7y ago
This was a big story a couple of days ago, even here on HN. Used to spread fud about sars-cov-2. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22684242
445.
Chloe Middleton did not have coronavirus(spiked-online.com)
2 points by s9w 7y ago|1 comments
446.
by s9w 7y ago
Depending on what exactly that 95% number is, that could be incredibly bad. There is some eye-opening math about testing inaccuracies combined with low case numbers.
447.
by s9w 7y ago
Well we would need 2000 days of those 2k days to even reach 50% infection of the total population. That is simply not possible to sustain with these extreme measures.
448.
by s9w 7y ago
The age is a monumental factor in this, I don't think it's wise to just toss it aside like that.
449.
by s9w 7y ago
Somethng else I wonder about all this: Let's look at Germany and say we have about 10000 new cases per day with the current measures, including unknown infections and some handwaving. That's a lot of days until you reach a signifi
450.
by s9w 7y ago
That seems strange. Most results are ready in 24h in Germany I think.

More ›