2 ms·
4th author on "Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback" https://arxiv.org/html/2203.02155v1 https://arxiv.org/html/2203.02155v1. Pu
by refulgentis 6d ago
4th author on "Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback" https://arxiv.org/html/2203.02155v1 https://arxiv.org/html/2203.02155v1.
Pure lie?
- hbrn 6d agoWriting a research about driving cars on a highway, doesn’t make you a “car inventor”, does it?
- verdverm 6d agodata analysis is different from algorithm design, the later is often considered 'inventing' due to the novel nature
- refulgentis 6d agoThe 4th author on "Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback" is purely lying when he says he coinvented ChatGPT and RLHF because writing a paper about RLHF is like writing about driving cars on the highway, whereas ??? is like (co-?)inventing cars, which is synonymous with his claim. I appreciate a good hot take, I really do. But I can't parse it.
- hbrn 6d agoI really don’t know what we’re arguing about here. You can google or ask your favorite LLM “who invented RLHF?”.
- refulgentis 6d ago> I really don’t know what we’re arguing about here. Your post above! :) - "His LinkedIn post says “At OpenAI, I co-invented ChatGPT and RLHF”. And while ChatGPT claim is a marketing stretch, RLHF one is a pure lie." > You can google or ask your favorite LLM "who invented RLHF?" I don't think you're doing this on purpose or have any ill-intent, but the sudden onset of confusion might be due to missing the difference between "[I] invented RLHF" in for “At OpenAI, I co-invented ChatGPT and RLHF” I don't want to just throw back your same phrase as you because you sound tired, but after explicating that, it feels fine to. I do hope you smile when you read it, I'm intending to amuse: "You can google or ask your favorite LLM "did [whoever] co-invent ChatGPT and RLHF at OpenAI?""
- hbrn 6d ago[flagged]
- addycb 6d agoYou're an llm