ratww

16 ms·

121.
by ratww 4y ago
Interestingly the reasoning from my doctor for me taking Escitalopram was that it was good for anxiety, so I guess there's at least some anecdotal evidence from doctors about its efficacy...
122.
by ratww 4y ago
Well, the app might be currently available in the AppStore but would now be able to move to an AltStore. Plenty of apps I bought in the past have been pulled from macOS AppStore but are available on websites. In the past I even had banks an
123.
by ratww 4y ago
I'm pretty sure the author will stop helping BMW if they become too annoying. Bitcoin users can still open issues, as long as they're not bitcoin-specific.
124.
by ratww 4y ago
There's several more, which is certainly much more than the author wants. Most of them seem to be trivial coding mistakes unrelated to the library, and contributors even helped on some before closing due to the rule. The users should p
125.
by ratww 4y ago
For me it was around the same time Mo3 mentioned they took, maybe a bit more than one year and a half. It's been long, so I don't remember precisely. However I was in a quite sorry state before... I was having several panic attack
126.
by ratww 4y ago
Also a happy customer of that one. It worked great for me even with a low dosage and didn’t otherwise negatively impact anything else.
127.
by ratww 4y ago
Fine, that's even better then: it continuous decreased from around 2004-2014, when the country was really really growing fast and fine af, to the point it was able to totally ignore the 2008 financial crisis. Amazeballs. By the way the
128.
by ratww 4y ago
Agree. I think it's kinda easy to find common ground, but everyone should be allowed a voice. With the "shut up, let Brazil destroy forests, we did it too", the only people that seem to be getting a voice are politically-co
129.
by ratww 4y ago
The only people who "don't want more developed countries" are the people that want Brazil to keep being a primary sector exporter that suffers from Resource curse ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_c
130.
by ratww 4y ago
Exactly. This is a very weak argument for something that is so damaging as letting the forest be destroyed for what is virtually zero economical gain to the population.
131.
by ratww 4y ago
> That doesn't improve Brazil, does it? I happen to believe that it does. In the worst case, we get to keep the forest. > Sovereignty means that nobody outside of Brazil gets a say without offering something major in return.
132.
by ratww 4y ago
It's considered "3rd world" actually, as much as the term is a bit useless. The term "2nd world" is reserved to former Soviet-aligned countries.
133.
by ratww 4y ago
Yep. Brazil doesn’t need to go trough another industrial revolution. Germany is happy to sell machines to Brazil.
134.
by ratww 4y ago
Nah. It’s gonna be either both together or none at all. Like another poster mentioned, when Brazil was growing, deforestation was shrinking. The meme that the Amazon has to be destroyed for the country to grow is quite new. Please stop spre
135.
by ratww 4y ago
Not exactly. What is happening now wasn't the reality in Brazil for some time before. Things were getting better.
136.
by ratww 4y ago
> The countries pointing fingers at Brazil all did the same to become more developed and to make their population richer, they just want to stop Brazil from doing the same so they can keep the prices of commodities they sell higher. My
137.
by ratww 4y ago
Alright, so now it seems I want Zimbabwe-style Socialism in Brazil, whatever that means. It seems you're too busy putting words in my mouth to care about what I wrote, so goodbye I guess. EDIT: Rightfully flagged/dead and I didn&#
138.
by ratww 4y ago
Alright then we're in agreement. > What I am saying is that the rich countries need to quit their double standard. The EU keeps putting absurd trade barriers to protect their own farmers. The US subsidizes their corn farms, effecti
139.
by ratww 4y ago
> There's a lot of people working in that automation. Sorry for the pun, but Brazil isn't really reaping the benefits of agricultural automation to compensate for the issues being an exclusively primary-sector exporter causes
140.
by ratww 4y ago
That's a very important post. > Brazil had no trouble to grow in 90s and 2000s while reducing Amazon deforestation. Thanks for putting it into words in a way I couldn't.
141.
by ratww 4y ago
Brazil is a "grown up" country. We can handle criticism. We don't need people being condescending to us about what others can or can't say to us. Let us brazilians defend ourselves, please? Another reason I'm fine w
142.
by ratww 4y ago
Ah perfect, then we're in agreement. A lot of people assume I'm being a radical and saying Brazil should stop exporting meat/soy/etc. I'm not. What I'm saying is that Brazil needs is a plan that's not simp
143.
by ratww 4y ago
In theory that makes a lot of sense. Truly. In reality, believing that and going froward with this plan was an immense setback to the country and the population. Europe/US/etc letting Brazil keep doing what it's doing is most
144.
by ratww 4y ago
Yes, and? My point is precisely that those people aren't going to start working in agriculture. The number of people working in agriculture is only shrinking, and there's several labour problems with agricultural work in Brazil th
145.
by ratww 4y ago
Bullshit. Brasil has >70% people working in the service sector. The percentage of people working in agriculture has actually shrunk since the Lula years. Mechanization and automation will guarantee it keeps shrinking. The current economi
146.
by ratww 4y ago
Oh nice, more condescension. I'll let it pass. Here's a real reply: This might work in aggregate, but doesn't really help the average Brazilian, nor makes the country become developed. If the economic measures are only favour
147.
by ratww 4y ago
Yep. But one way of distributing this across the population is by favouring other sectors rather than strangling them to favour the primary. The number of people working in the agricultural sector has only shrunk and will keep shrinking due
148.
by ratww 4y ago
I can't speak for Argentina, but Brazil is a farm/ranch mix, I guess. We do both.
149.
by ratww 4y ago
And my point is that Brazil won't get rich by doing what it is currently doing. The primary sector won't enrich the general population or make the country more developed. Only some people favoured by the current government. That&#
150.
by ratww 4y ago
What does it have to do with anything? Import oriented agriculture/livestock is not really serving the local economy or making the country grow. Like other poster said, "Brazil had no trouble to grow in 90s and 2000s while reduci

More ›