qmaybe

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by qmaybe 3y ago

   I’m glad you brought this up. So there’s different levels of bullshit right ? Quantum has a level of bullshit where an enterprise could tell a customer their systems will solve P=NP. Clearly we don’t have information theory that supports th
2. 2.▲
   by qmaybe 3y ago

   Neutral atoms don’t fare much better for gate fidelity, error correction algorithms are the only way to compute useful problems then probably Edit: quera is having its moment with the darpa announcement and the 48-logical qubit accomplishme
3. 3.▲
   by qmaybe 3y ago

   That’s one way to put it. But more specifically they have customers with use cases studied in detail, where a modest quantum advantage becomes highly profitable, so all they need to do now is ship and the bookings will come in.
4. 4.▲
   by qmaybe 3y ago

   It means that they are willing to claim to the public that there is a business case for their technology providing billions in value in that year. They do not have the bookings.
5. 5.▲
   by qmaybe 3y ago

   The roadmap of IONQ has them producing 64 logical qubits with error correction within 2025. Whether or not they succeed, I think time will tell as theyve stopped publishing and a cofounder stepped down to return to teaching and research. Qu