photoGrant

6 ms·

1.
by photoGrant 3y ago
I’ll be more subtle in my agenda to match the spirit of the site
2.
by photoGrant 3y ago
:)
3.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Then who in this black box private company is the Oracle of infinite wisdom and truth!? Who are you putting in charge? Can I get a vote?
4.
by photoGrant 3y ago
If it's a question of facts, why are you allowing blind assumptions to lead your opinion? Do you have sources and evidence for their agenda that matches your beliefs?
5.
by photoGrant 3y ago
I've been part of the advertising and marketing world for a lot of these companies for a decade plus, I've helped them sell bullshit. I've also been at the start of the AI journey, I've downloaded and checked local model
6.
by photoGrant 3y ago
I never said each of these exist in a vacuum. It is the collation of all that is the danger. This isn't democratic. This is companies now toying with governmental ideologies.
7.
by photoGrant 3y ago
No, ignoring laws and stealing data to increase your Castle's MOAT is the win. Compute isn't an open source solvable problem. I can't DirtyPCB's an A100 Making the argument open source is the answer is an agenda of makin
8.
by photoGrant 3y ago
No, compute is keys to the kingdom. The rest are assets and ammunition. You out-compute your enemy, you out-compute your competition. That's the race. The data is part of the problem, not the root. These companies are silo'ing the
9.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Absolutely it won't. We've armed the issue with a supersonic jet engine and we're assuming if we build a slingshot out of pop sticks we'll somehow catch up and knock it off course.
10.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Remind yourself we're discussing censorship, misinformation, inability to define or source truth and we're concerned on Day 1 about the results of image gen being controlled by a for profit single entity with incentives that focus
11.
by photoGrant 3y ago
AI Profiteers are excited. Everyone else is annoyed.
12.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Watch your opinion on this get silenced in subtle ways. From gaslighting to thread nerfing to vote locking.... Ask why anyone would engage in those behaviours vs the merit of the arguments and the voice of the people. The strings are reveal
13.
by photoGrant 3y ago
No one accepts this is ok. Personal agenda might argue people should've known better. Something something Spanish inquisition. The same crowd here that argue EULA's are a joke and need refactoring to protect the consumer are forge
14.
by photoGrant 3y ago
I've had 'AI Attorneys' on Twitter unable to even debate the most basic of arguments. It is definitely a self fulfilling death spiral and no one wants to check reality.
15.
by photoGrant 3y ago
I have more faith in society than I do the vultures eating away at it, at least.
16.
by photoGrant 3y ago
How altruistic! This definitely has nothing to do with keeping the biggest court case arguments at bay.
17.
by photoGrant 3y ago
This arrogant vacuum is going to get checked by society.
18.
by photoGrant 3y ago
It's cognitive dissonance to such an arrogant and ignorant degree it's turning out to be the best sunlight we've ever needed on the situation. No one is arguing a balanced or logical alternative. Every argument ignores the en
19.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Oh, I'm sorry, did I argue my omnipotence? Or the fallacy of marketing? You shifted the goalposts pretty far. Our existence in the 'now' means we're reactive to the now and the universe of events influence us as much if
20.
by photoGrant 3y ago
We agree. But remember, approximations here are nothing but lies masked as convenience.
21.
by photoGrant 3y ago
"For the purposes of this talk the details don't matter" So if you want to learn the context of what 'performance' means there's no answer. "You shouldn't trust any of these numbers too much" but
22.
by photoGrant 3y ago
I'll save you reading; > With that in mind, we need to ask what companies must do to use AI responsibly. > What are a corporation’s responsibilities in the age of AI—to its employees, its customers, and its shareholders? Responsi
23.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Where's my opt out.
24.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Currently the weapons against bullshit is trying to talk to it. Engage and you'll find only 5% of the time there is depth, or earnest. The rest is just airing itself like dirty laundry by the second response and ultimately just serves
25.
by photoGrant 3y ago
To model physics and not just a playground pretend version of it, you need to model the complete understanding of physics within the entire universe. We'd need answers to questions we're UNKNOWN-TIME away from understanding. This
26.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Hindsight being the premise for confidence in this context is precisely why the hubris of factual speaking on the what-if's of the future can be pretty easily ignored as self infatuated authority. The rest of your arguments are still c
27.
by photoGrant 3y ago
*ALL* current public proof of concepts for AI are a dead end. They are strictly past information ingest machines. Until 'Generative' solution thinking finally stops chasing the tail of history and believing that what it has ingest
28.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Yes. Master.
29.
by photoGrant 3y ago
One is an expression of all through self, another is a skill to a solution. One is given value by society's response, the other by a companies incentives. When you take an artists desire to speak to the world through self expression, a
30.
by photoGrant 3y ago
This is exhausting. Just read a history book. Yes, power started with families. Then big families - kings and queens and y'know, we slowly but surely woke up to being a kinder humanity not a more brutal one. You'd have thought. Ar

More ›