photoGrant

10 ms·

31.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Once again people think they can productivity their way to results as if it's a quantifiable and profitable resource. Culture, Creativity and Art are HUMAN expression of a HUMAN condition. To generate it with a computer means to create
32.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Your beliefs and words are stripping me of my talents, livelihood, journey, meaning, finances and goals and you're upset that I call it ignorant, uncaring and dehumanizing. Hypocritical or not, these are not my attempts at creatively i
33.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Who is 'we' in your arguments. Master? And why do you think laws exist? It's to protect the rich from being burned at the stake by reality. Societal agreements go both ways. You think it's to feign appeasement to the lit
34.
by photoGrant 3y ago
I'll simplify this for everyone; (misquoted you originally, sorry!) If you take a box and fill it with dog shit. You're more than welcome to chop, blend, dilute, fling or even eat this shit. But in the end, it's still Pepper&
35.
by photoGrant 3y ago
I have no desire to be sneaky. Creatively pointed. Please report me if needed, I have no qualms exercising my ability to express humanity when someone attempts to dehumanise. Especially if I can do so in a way that opens up an avenue for re
36.
by photoGrant 3y ago
I don't play football unless the goalposts remain stationary.
37.
by photoGrant 3y ago
If this was all done in the open as hoped, as promised and the worlds scientists were in pursuit of the same goal, I'd accept these arguments all day and keep my ignorant mouth shut. But to lie and say otherwise goes against the timeli
38.
by photoGrant 3y ago
My recommendation, civil or otherwise is to at least feign a moment of empathy and understanding for your fellow man in order to balance an otherwise repeat cliche that fundamentally argues for self. An inability to empathise first stops an
39.
by photoGrant 3y ago
I'll start caring about my fellow humans rights when I see each and everyone one of their tax returns. Until then my assumptions will appease my ability to remain ignorant.
40.
by photoGrant 3y ago
As per usual, money thinks of a human as a commodity for sale, not a neighbour being exploited or livelihood being stripped. If you think throwing life into a black box and consuming its results will improve productivity and enhance creativ
41.
by photoGrant 3y ago
The financial few have created a battle against the very world that have put them there. It might not be clear where the exit is, but it's clear the incentives are fundamentally opposite. Something, something Emperor's new clothes
42.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Indeed, a tale as old as time. If only this inept thinking could extend beyond short term financial gain. When (not if) the average Luddite begins to reject and disconnect from AI wholly whether productively or emotionally, who exactly is p
43.
by photoGrant 3y ago
The same executives that would argue and protect the IP of any major company out there right now are somehow saying the complete opposite when it reduces down to the individual. If this hasn't revealed the hypocrisy of thinking when ch
44.
by photoGrant 3y ago
I asked this question a few days ago and the responses, arrogance and ignorance was astounding. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39406709 I promise, if I'm here asking this week, there's millions more that wil
45.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Financially rich. Morally bankrupt. Thanks Sham Altman.
46.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Indeed this is footage, but this is far from the world's first. Fun watch.
47.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Likely a response to I-SOON.
48.
by photoGrant 3y ago
They did the same accidentally to the co-founder https://twitter.com/defunkt/status/1754610843361362360 Once I'd seen that, I doubled down on my self hosted GitLab and never looked back. GitHub can be a mirro
49.
by photoGrant 3y ago
You never even read the post enough to engage on the core topic. Keep confusing yourself. The original question was how to find out, you've done all but conflate your issues with my concerns. I quoted the one portion that expressed you
50.
by photoGrant 3y ago
I have an image in my head of a robot drone about to kamikaze its way into my body and I'm holding up a robots.txt print out hoping it'll read it. Great catch on the usernames thing. Won't unsee now. This place truly is as bu
51.
by photoGrant 3y ago
I'll see you in court. The law will change. When you have the ability to even debate the complexities of film photography versus digital and the dual nature this medium falls under versus digital which I'll remind you again is und
52.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Friend, I have agreed with your core issue, you have just assumed my work has already been otherwise 'bought' and argued this fact the entire marathon. Your assumptions of what I'm trying to get at, are what you're argui
53.
by photoGrant 3y ago
The content is trained upon styles and techniques and aesthetics built upon by artists in the context of history. Society and those current realities mixed with the ability to conceptualize the future and enact change in ways that reach hum
54.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Thank you so very much. I'll be looking into using these tools as part of our deliverables workflow. It's as much as I assumed but I'd have hoped for more understanding and dialog on the matter, you're the first to offer
55.
by photoGrant 3y ago
You make yourself very clear, you have no intent of understanding my position. I appreciate you trying to troll, but my concern as I've stated for the umpteenth time is that I would like to know if my personal work on my personal websi
56.
by photoGrant 3y ago
Conventional weapons are not the future. Cyber warfare is not the future. But computable reactive weapons are. The answer is compute/efficiency is the weapon of the future. The faster and more efficient you are, the quicker your decisi
57.
by photoGrant 3y ago
You haven't purchased my work, please stop saying you have. Your argument ends there despite your words continuing far beyond.
58.
by photoGrant 3y ago
I appreciate you arguing so far past me that you fail to see we agree on half of your points. I'll leave it there. Suggest less, empathise more -- you might find a halfway point where both people have valid points. > We don't w
59.
by photoGrant 3y ago
It is a physical property manifested from a collection of thoughts. Much like anything else we create. You wrote a lot but you accept and reject my premise in the same breath because goalposts and personal agenda. You also seem to miss the
60.
by photoGrant 3y ago
If we are to reduce this to a vacuum in which we don't exist in a modern society with expectations and agreements, I'd accept your philosophising. Otherwise it's a distraction to the issue. No one has these arguments when the

More ›