peter422

21 ms·

1. 271.▲
   by peter422 4y ago

   So I should believe the propaganda of the country that is invading another country under an obviously false pretense?
2. 272.▲
   by peter422 4y ago

   I'm confused how we are going from 400 clicks per day last October in the GSC graph (which is 12,000 hits per month) to 60,000+ visitors per month from SEO, especially given how little growth there is in that full year of data, and how
3. 273.▲
   by peter422 4y ago

   It already exists.
4. 274.▲
   by peter422 4y ago

   If your car is on public roads in a dense city like SF it is so easy to track already with existing infrastructure this is a moot point.
5. 275.▲
   by peter422 4y ago

   You legally can’t have cameras that give speeding tickets in California. It’s quite annoying as they’d save so many lives because speeding is the primary factor in most accidents (and makes any accidents worse).
6. 276.▲
   by peter422 4y ago

   And what benefit is the company getting from saying a person that is not going to contribute to the company in any way is an “advisor”? I guess the company should just do that with every former employee? I mean, why not. This is the behavi
7. 277.▲
   by peter422 4y ago

   Again, it’s a waste of time. The company nor the former employee should be wasting their time with saving face. The startup has actual important things to do and the former employee has new projects to start. When a founder leaves it isn’
8. 278.▲
   by peter422 4y ago

   > In recent months I craved more time to explore new ideas again as a founder, and decided to leave Clubhouse while staying on as an advisor. Just at an FYI to the author, this is a bad idea. Once you have left a startup, your opinions
9. 279.▲
   by peter422 4y ago

   “Placebo Effect Accounts for More Than Two-Thirds of COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Events, Researchers Find” https://www.bidmc.org/about-bidmc/news/2022/01/placebo-effec... It seems very unintuitive but when
10. 280.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    Yes they have huge contracts but they also have to produce the vaccine! And the vaccine could be waaay more expensive given its value to the people who took it. Merck stock (no vaccine) had the exact same return as Pfizer over the past 5 y
11. 281.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    https://www.fda.gov/media/144337/download You think the FDA is going to make a decision about a vaccine without a preregistered, public, clinical trial?
12. 282.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    But it’s all a giant conspiracy dude! The vaccines which nobody is taking and cost under $20 are worth pharma companies engaging in secret underhanded methods to hurt other vaccines (even though all their FDA filings and research are most
13. 283.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    The rates of breastfeeding in the U.S. have gone way way up over the past 30-40 years so I don’t think your theory fits the data.
14. 284.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    California income tax has no carve outs for capital gains so I don’t know where you got that idea. Rich people specifically don’t like California because of the taxes (as compared to other No or low income tax states). I assume you are ref
15. 285.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    I don’t doubt the sincerity of the poster and their excitement for moving platforms, but this really reads like an advertisement for ghost, especially with all the specifically selected anchor texts and no mention of any other alternative o
16. 286.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    FYI if one human could manage 10 or 20 cars, that would still be a huge efficiency improvement over the current situation.
17. 287.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    So your argument is because the court regained hard earned approval in the past it is guaranteed to do so again? Or the court can function perpetually against the public will?
18. 288.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    It doesn’t matter what camp you fall into, or if you think the courts decisions in the past were “wrong” (though obviously there is no absolute right or wrong interpreting how a 250 year old document interfaces with modern society). The cou
19. 289.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    But then it’s all very self-contradictory. How are people supposed to have faith in the court when it makes a decision, reaffirms it many times over nearly 50 years, then just changes its mind on a dime? The judicial branch has a responsibi
20. 290.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    I assume “anybody” includes people with 0 hours of gun training, convicted felons, children, non-residents, non-citizens and those with serious mental illnesses? A right is a right!
21. 291.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    To determine who can and cannot concealed carry a gun. Why does a driver and car need to go on a registry? You just said that was ok.
22. 292.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    So we can have separate state registries of: residents, voters, drivers, students, people on disability, people who are unemployed, among others, but gun owners would be too much?
23. 293.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    If I’m choosing a house to rob, sounds like a really really dumb idea to choose one where the person owns a gun. If anything the gun owners should be happy, the government gave them free deterrence from being the target of crime.
24. 294.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    California has banned all guns? Some states have actually banned all abortions so it seems like you should be able to point to a single statewide official suggesting all guns be banned. Otherwise you might be guilty of exaggerating just a
25. 295.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    Fortunately there is nothing else the state forces you to purchase so this is a very clean ideological point you are making.
26. 296.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    Persuasion isn’t that important when the vast majority of the public already agrees with you.
27. 297.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    So if you think crypto is mostly a scam the solution is to get into options trading? Staying away and warning your friends/family about the scammy nature of many coins is a perfectly reasonable response.
28. 298.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    This just doesn’t make sense though. A company is going to have some standard bands of compensation, and if you demand something way outside of the bands based on your own feelings of stock value, they aren’t going to hire you no matter ho
29. 299.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    Tender offers will only happen when somebody wants to buy stock, which means they think the stock price is lower than it will be in the future, which means they expect the company to grow or keep growing. The companies where liquidation pre
30. 300.▲
    by peter422 4y ago

    There is not a single respectable startup in existence that will give a random employee options or stock with liquidation preferences. For 99.9% of startups that would involve making a new class of shares for you, which ain’t gonna happen.