3 ms·

So your argument is because the court regained hard earned approval in the past it is guaranteed to do so again? Or the court can function perpetually against

• frumper 4y ago
  His argument is that Congress should legislate these issues either through proper laws or constitutional amendments. Turns out 9 judges might disagree with the previous set of 9 judges. That disagreement swings both ways and in the absence of proper legislative action will become the law of the land.