Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pedrocr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
33 ms
·
331.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
That seems to be for a 2006 Daikin model: > The heat pump model is based on linear interpolation in a performance map retrieved from manufacturer data (Daikin Europe N.V., 2006). And that model is half as good as the modern one I linked:
332.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
"Name a source please" :) Keeping 5x over the entire winter includes some pretty cold nights. And ground source systems can improve even this by quite a bit.
333.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
Here's a current R32 system by Daikin: https://www.daikin.co.uk/content/dam/dauk/document-library/d... SCOP is at 5.15 and that's a seasonally adjusted value. So over the entirety of the winter
334.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
The explanation of needing to pre-heat the air into the heat pump is strange. Modern A/C systems can pump heat at 500%+ efficiency even with very cold outside temperatures, no pre-heating needed. Replacing that with resistances is a 5x
335.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
Here's the HN discussion of it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26192025
336.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
> Linux desktop isn’t dead because big companies and VCs are chasing ROI. Linux on the desktop is dead because most current Linux desktop developers don’t want or use software the same way as the average person. So they don’t build what
337.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
Uncontained engine failures are cause to ground whole fleets of planes, even if the resulting emergency ended up mild. You're downplaying it way too much.
338.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
Uncontained engine failures are a big deal. Exactly because they're a risk to the plane, as debris can cause other failures, and a risk to people on the ground. Engines are specifically tested to see if they can contain these failures.
339.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
Yep, the no-panic crate is the hack I mentioned. It's using the linking process to fail compilation if I remember correctly. It only works on individual functions. rustig I didn't know and looks very interesting, thanks. Having it
340.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
The article is a short piece that basically says "Remember that kerfuffle about Whatsapp TOS that lead Facebook to put it on hold? It's back on". For that purpose the paragraph it does include describing the kinds of changes
341.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
Rust also has the traceback/exception error handling mode in the panic cases. And since there's no standard way to check those at compile time you're left to fuzz the code to find all the possibilities (or use some hacks). It
342.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
If I didn't screw up the math that would be ~7% of UK's 2020 GDP and around 60% of the GDP loss in 2020 compared to 2019. It would be really expensive but the scale of what's happening is also huge. So maybe not the greatest
343.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
Ubuntu LTS already has the hardware enablement stack to solve this very issue. You stay on the LTS but get newer kernel/mesa/etc for hardware support.
344.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
That would seem like a great defense if it was the algorithm making a choice on what to promote. But they're apparently actively removing the content. There doesn't seem to be any reason for that in their model.
345.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
> The Zen 3 and M1 chips are unfairly being compared even in recent articles to 10th gen Intel chips when 11th gen is widely available. If you do the opposite and compare Intel 11th gen to Zen2 the differences are stark: https:/&#x
346.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
I don't get the argument that browsers are an example of how hard this is when browsers are today already completely capable of doing the right thing as clients. And so does Windows by the way. What keeps me from having a fractionally
347.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
> There is no "non-broken" way that an app can consistently render at a real number scale into an integer sized buffer. Everything is going to have rounding or blurring in some way. This is unavoidable. This is just not true. T
348.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
> For a vector UI that is supposed to be pixel-aligned, you can't render that at a non-integer scale without the same blurriness that you would get with doing the scaling in the compositor. That's different from rendering print
349.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
Only if the app is broken. The rendering engine needs to be able to fill whatever pixel size at whatever scale. If you mean that you can no longer do 2x and scale down at the exact perfect scale then that's true, but only a limitation
350.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
> It's not correct because you are not rendering at 2/3 scale anymore, you are rendering at 0.665 or 0.67 scale. You won't get the same result as rendering the entire screen at the same scale because you're snapping w
351.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
> There is unfortunately no way to do this that doesn't break down in mixed-DPI situations because of the rounding issues. I don't think I've been able to explain then. There's strictly less rounding than today this w
352.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
> They aren't forced to draw at 2x and be scaled down. They only need to do that if you have enabled fractional scaling. Fractional scaling is exactly what we're talking about. At 1x/2x everything works. > If you really
353.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
> You can't be pixel perfect in the 1.5x screen if your renderer is scaling correctly and thus is rendering lines at 1.5 pixels wide. Pixel-perfect is not the standard. If you're rendering a PDF everything starts out in vector
354.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
Quite the opposite. Once you push the problem to the client a lot of them already know how to do it and by not doing two scaling steps you can make much better decisions. And you don't need coordinates as floating point at all. What yo
355.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
It's not how it works at all for fractional scaling, which is the point. And you don't give it a 133.33 box. That's what you're in effect doing now by having the compositor scale the whole screen. You give it an actual 1
356.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
> This was discussed at length years ago and it was decided that passing a fractional scale value to the client is not what you want, makes the code much more complicated and doesn't really solve the blurriness. From your link: &quo
357.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
It would actually be great if Wayland would allow clients to handle HiDPI themselves but it doesn't which makes fractional scaling much worse than it needs to be. Wayland defines integer scaling only and then compositors scale 2x conte
358.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
Could you explain what the problem would be then? What exposure would Robinhood and their credit provider have to a situation where a stock collapses that is being held long and not on margin by their clients? The client would definitely no
359.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
Calling it impossible to flip votes is quite silly. You can just pre-program the machine to pick a candidate randomly every few votes and you skew the election. Do it after the first few votes to give you a distribution so as to only do it
360.
▲
by
pedrocr
6y ago
>Unfortunately I don't think there's huge scope for more hydro across Europe as it's very disruptive to build. My doubt is not really about new hydro. I suspect it's mostly maxed out in most places. Both because of ge
More ›