Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
paulgb
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
66 ms
·
841.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
Yep. To put some numbers on this, transaction fees are currently about 1% of the block reward[1]. As of the next halving next year, transaction fees would have to grow by 50x to make up for the lower block reward. Bitcoiners I talk to eithe
842.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
The building was in the news again last week because it was leased as a sort of “WeWork for crypto” and had to shut down given the market downturn. https://www.coindesk.com/web3/2023/01/03/web3-co-working
843.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
I came here to say rice cooker as well. I got a $15 one years ago and it's still my most-used appliance. What high end one do you have? I've been considering an upgrade given that I use it so often.
844.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
> Or has it always been this way, and the only difference is the way we communicate with each other now naturally results in mass failures of common sense? I don't think we're living in a particularly unique time this way. The
845.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
There is a SharedMemoryBuffer, but it’s a web platform thing, not available in out-of-browser runtimes like wasmtime or wasmer or wasmedge (which Docker uses).
846.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
I think you could share an address space by using the same SharedArrayBuffer to back the linear memory of both? I could be wrong here, I haven’t done it, but I thought this was the reason for supporting atomics in the first place. https:&#
847.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
“Threading support” in this sense is a bit of a misnomer, it’s really support for thread-safe memory constructs. Creating threads is left up to the runtime. On the web, this is done with WebWorkers, but on the server side I don’t think ther
848.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
It seems this is replacing both, in that the wasm module is not run inside of a traditional linux container (at least as far as cgroups go). > Each traditional container gets its own control group as in docker/ee44.... On the other
849.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
I did not know that, I stand corrected!
850.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
I’m a fan/user of Pulumi, but this doesn’t feel similar to me. In Pulumi you write code that describes infrastructure, separate from the application layer code you’re deploying. This appears to be using application code to derive infra
851.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
I hope they add this to Adobe Premiere, it would be useful for cleaning up audio from talk recordings.
852.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
I think the Apple rule they're referring to is that if you have an in-app transaction, you're not allowed to reference the fact that the transaction can be made off-app (which would avoid Apple's 30% cut). It's not quite
853.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
I did, but I fortunately didn't have $500k to “invest” in a game at the time.
854.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
They are using that for cover, but the block goes far beyond that content. I have an account on a smallish, niche community Mastodon instance which is closed to sign-ups. I can’t tweet or DM a message containing a link to my account there.
855.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
> Because most of the tech sphere is all in when it comes to rooting for a certain political side and for its associated worldview Huh? People I know in tech range from communists to anarchists to hard libertarian. “Tech”, however you de
856.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
The pivot from “I am against censorship that goes far beyond the law”[1] to “I get to use censorship to kneecap a competitor because it’s my site now” was almost comically quick. [1] https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status&
857.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
If your developers are already familiar with React, I think next makes a lot of sense for a corporate website. When used as a static site generator, you can reduce a lot of complexity over wordpress et al. because you don’t need a database
858.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
WASI and Emscripten exist because people want to write code that interacts with the outside world. Your approach is fine if you just want to call into some math functions and are ok writing your own bindings, but that’s not how most people
859.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
The information is still relevant to someone who wants to ship wasm code today. AFAIK no browser supports the component model, and interface types never made it past proposal stage in favor of the component model.
860.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
There's a lot of complexity in using WebAssembly, but I thought this article did a good job of focusing on one specific point of confusion: why there are multiple compile targets, and what the difference between emscripten and WASI are
861.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
> If these censorship request were about bomb threats or something that’s one thing, but they are mostly just spicy political takes. There’s some selection bias here — the tweets we see in the thread are the ones twitter didn’t remove
862.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
The problem all these sites have is that the domain starts as a signal of high quality — either because they are initially exclusive like Medium, or pay high-quality writers to move over. Over time, they regress to the mean and the domain b
863.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
And yet Musk is suing the @elonjet guy because someone attacked his car. See what I mean by the irony? https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603190155107794944?s=20...
864.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
Don’t you see the irony here, though? When a very powerful man with a large following “just posts a screenshot”, he is supposed to be unaccountable for the actions his followers take, even if his additional context dog-whistles to his fans
865.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
I do give him credit for those things, but the guy is one of the most powerful people in the world and uses that power to bully. He keeps using his position of power to punch down at people who usually don’t deserve it. It’s petty and pathe
866.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
Yes, he's not particularly consistent. Still, this was the account he held up as evidence that he was committed to free speech, because he refused to ban it even though he didn't like it. Now it’s banned.
867.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
For one thing, because he specifically stated that he wouldn't ban the @elonjet account: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1589414958508691456?s=46...
868.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
Musk a month ago: > My commitment to free speech extends even to not banning the account following my plane, even though that is a direct personal safety risk https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1589414958508691
869.
▲
by
paulgb
4y ago
There are some comments in here that verge on assuming bad faith on the part of the companies involved, so I think it's worth pointing out that this is a new law which has been in effect for just over a month. It's been on the way
870.
▲
Generalizing Secret Santa with integer programming
(paulbutler.org)
2 points
by
paulgb
4y ago
|
0 comments
More ›