patronagezero

5 ms·

1.
by patronagezero 12y ago
Benchmarks are snake oil when not being given the ability to reproduce them.
2.
by patronagezero 12y ago
No worries, I'm sure everyone contributes more to their respective governments to break encryption than they'll every send to anyone seeking to protect it. Send more money to this guy if you want to feel better about your shitty (
3.
by patronagezero 12y ago
> several people (not conspiracy theorists) Nice, you choose to single out a section of people who've been reliably wrong, and excluded them from the people that have historically been correct. Good job, you tool.
4.
by patronagezero 12y ago
Your very own government sponsored taxi, less city and state control and now with improved tracking and information awareness! Red or blue pill, they'll choke 'em both down with a few sips of progress.
5.
by patronagezero 12y ago
Wow, so you didn't bother reading what I typed about my accident earlier. I'm sure people that disregard the law completely will just suddenly start paying for insurance and you'll never have to bother, say, paying more for u
6.
by patronagezero 12y ago
Haha, does not improve the conversation according to you because? Is incorrect because? Close minded because? Misleads people from the truth only you know? You should pull your head out...
7.
by patronagezero 12y ago
No worries, plenty agree with you, but few fight the flood here on HN any longer. I never vote and rarely comment. The whole premise of comment voting is groupthink 3.0. I cherish down-votes on HN, just like I cherish disagreeing with the i
8.
by patronagezero 12y ago
Luck has nothing to do with genetics or the history that created them. Any system that requires the coercion of subjects to submit against their will for it to be successful (it isn't and will not be) is a foolish approach to an indivi
9.
by patronagezero 12y ago
They're a facade, a ruse to convince the american's that they still have a say in the matters of the US Government. This should have been obvious when they took the hot air of their contributors and flew it over the NSA HQ.
10.
by patronagezero 12y ago
Your comment has reference to nothing useful to the conversation. None.
11.
by patronagezero 12y ago
Yet living responsibility has clearly put me into a different cost bracket as opposed to the useful idiots. I've never been to the dentist, have straight cavity-free teeth, and never needed to see a doctor aside from once, where I paid
12.
by patronagezero 12y ago
I hope you truly see nothing wrong with paying for (and forcing others to pay for) someone's sugar addiction, cellphone conversation while driving, smoking or drinking addition, otherwise I hope you DO enjoy the nanny state stepping in
13.
by patronagezero 12y ago
Wow, what a load. Health insurance is a scam for the over-socialized. Why don't you have food insurance as well? I freelance BECAUSE I don't want to participate in the insurance industry. I freelance for the specific reason of dod
14.
by patronagezero 12y ago
I think people should really consider that there was nothing but the intent to assist in the Sony PR campaign in the first place. The US Government is a corporation first and foremost, both on paper, and in action. They want to see all of t
15.
by patronagezero 12y ago
What depths of poor taste we find ourselves in, to be disagreeing with pg on hn. Even pg can occasionally come off as an ignoramus, but don't let that convince you of the fallibility of your glorious leader.
16.
by patronagezero 12y ago
Surrender your welfare programs (social security, public schools, the postal office, health insurance, the war machine, NASA, etc) and I'll be on board with completely open immigration. Barring that, you're just another corporate
17.
by patronagezero 12y ago
I'm sure the EU governments each have a hand in the cookie jar as well. This isn't about state secrets as much as having an emotional and mental thermometer into the subjects of the elite. The machine must continue evolving and be
18.
by patronagezero 12y ago
I agree that it's unlikely the hack itself was a PR stunt, but you have to admit the subsequent handling of the hack was a PR stunt in which even the US Government seemed to be in on.
19.
by patronagezero 12y ago
Programming is popular now, so I guess it follows that the pop-gobbling consumerists that ingest propaganda hourly would start overrunning the hacker types. How I miss the pre-2003 slashdot type commentators and hackers in general.
20.
by patronagezero 12y ago
Throw yourself in the 'pessimist' camp if you like, I'm merely not an optimist to the point of ignoring reality. I love watching people gasping for optimistic news, it speaks to just how hard reality is going to slap those pe
21.
by patronagezero 12y ago
I didn't realize it was a competition between the sexes. Pick your side and game on, then.
22.
by patronagezero 12y ago
You're over-complicating the issue, I think. Why not just do it themselves, then claim it was 'Anonymous'? No convincing required and no one to argue with. The whole thing smells like just another move to convince the non-bel
23.
by patronagezero 12y ago
You really believe that just because their parents failed the children decided not to try for themselves? Perhaps it has more to do with seeing how their parents failed. Specifically since the article is geared towards men, maybe it speaks
24.
by patronagezero 12y ago
I live with a girl and have no intentions of classifying that relationship through the state. This article is a joke. Check out the MGTOW movement if you're interested in the real reason guys are refusing to get married.
25.
by patronagezero 12y ago
... I'm not going to touch that, but perhaps you should spend a bit more time reflecting on that thought before you open yourself up to conversation on the issue.
26.
by patronagezero 12y ago
> A universe without a conciseness to appreciate it is quite pointless, and might as well not exist. I value life in all forms too much to agree with that statement. I value humans the most, but only if they can find a way to value thems
27.
by patronagezero 12y ago
On an individual level, yes. However, if we require some central authority to demand at the point of a gun (abstractly) for us to clean up our act, then I think we're better off facing our own obsolescence.
28.
by patronagezero 12y ago
It's a hard sell to get me to concern myself with the environment when humanity is headed in the direction it's going. The earth will be just fine, even in the event that we can no longer survive on it, I'm more concerned wit
29.
by patronagezero 12y ago
Well, you just blew my mind with that last link. I'll have to give that recipe a try as well, I'm pretty sure it'll be worth it. Thanks!
30.
by patronagezero 12y ago
You are correct, edited for clarity.

More ›