oneplane

39 ms·

421.
by oneplane 3y ago
This isn't just about mobile telephones, or android for that matter. It's about on-device TPUs or AI accelerators or parallel compute units.
422.
by oneplane 3y ago
Qualcomm hasn't been able to manufacture desktop-class ARM devices yet (see SQ1 and X13 ARM edition), and the GPU IP doesn't really hold a candle to what else is out there either. They are however using significantly less power th
423.
by oneplane 3y ago
I doubt Qualcomm will be able to increase their performance ahead of Nvidia decreasing their energy requirements.
424.
by oneplane 3y ago
Indeed. Nothing is as specific as that disk operating system.
425.
by oneplane 3y ago
Looks like everyone enjoys guessing things in non-retail releases, so I'll join in on the fun: my guess it's the same type of deprecation warning you'd normally only get in the system log, but now you get a popup as well. May
426.
by oneplane 3y ago
The only IAM-safe way is to run context-aware terraform plans so the environments cannot ever CRUD out of scope. For example, an application-centric approach might use an ABAC constraint and temporary credentials (perhaps via OIDC, but most
427.
by oneplane 3y ago
I think in my case (and almost everyone else's case) we'll never go Lyft-scale, but with about 100 AWS accounts (and a bunch of Cloudflare, On-Prem [Compute, Networking], GitHub and other providers) and 300 terraform environments
428.
by oneplane 3y ago
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned Atlantis yet. Running bare terraform in CI is a bad idea (to the extent that running an 'expect' script for an interactive tool is a bad idea), and when you consider the impact it can have (
429.
by oneplane 3y ago
I that case your situation is likely irrelevant for the masses. It also still matters what performance bracket you're targeting.
430.
by oneplane 3y ago
Some of the laptop issues are a chain of dependencies that en up with mechanical and power envelope. That doesn't mean it's impossible, but say you want to go from 720p to 2k, that also requires more power, a bit for the panel and
431.
by oneplane 3y ago
It's probably legally infeasible, as well as bad for Apple's own advertisement business. They also can't make different rules for the same legal reasons.
432.
by oneplane 3y ago
With the current specs, pricing and usefulness this actually seems like a bad deal. Not a useless deal, and in the Windows space perhaps the only real deal, but a bad deal nonetheless. What it can be is a good starting point for the industr
433.
by oneplane 3y ago
Sounds like defective devices. Haven't had a single issue like that on any of our fleets. (mixed T2, M1, M2 devices, around 210 per fleet, around 7 fleets in 3 different countries) Usage (varies over time...): software development (Jet
434.
by oneplane 3y ago
I suppose it depends on what performance bracket you are targeting. Scripting and interpreted languages, JIT next and VM after that (i.e. JVM, CLR), native code after that and optimised low-level code after that would all have very differen
435.
by oneplane 3y ago
As long as you have a complete userland in your image and a compatible kernel and no extra CAP or binds, it really doesn't matter at all what else the host is doing. That's true for most mainstream architectures and distros of the
436.
by oneplane 3y ago
Sounds to me like an excellent time to put life before profits for a change.
437.
by oneplane 3y ago
I'm also not sure what's "wrong" with existing terminal emulators, except render acceleration when you do a lot of text I/O, but I think urxvt already had that solved. Other items seem to be solved outside of the te
438.
by oneplane 3y ago
That's why I mentioned kernel and runtime compatibility.
439.
by oneplane 3y ago
If they deliver their EMR as a container, it no longer matters what host OS it runs on because the container doesn't have to interact with it. Just like RHEL doesn't have to care if it runs on AMD or Intel or if it is virtual or p
440.
by oneplane 3y ago
This is why I try to avoid healthcare and banking etc. Too much legacy vendor stuff which is hard to modernise. This whole "supported distro" stuff wouldn't matter if they just packaged their software in the shape of a contai
441.
by oneplane 3y ago
It never was. Using ORM made the pool of candidates to work on a codebase bigger, and it made applications better on average (not because of some ultimate performance or security metric but because it evens out all the horrible hacks). In a
442.
by oneplane 3y ago
> "No more disruptive switching" How about you don't decide that for everyone, Microsoft? <rant> This is the same BS that pushes 'conditional acces' based on what browser you happen to be using, or their id
443.
by oneplane 3y ago
You conflate malice with sloppiness. Out of the American government people there were at least 4 high-profile cases in which 3 of the perps were transparent and compliant, and one wasn't. It does make a significant difference. Trying t
444.
by oneplane 3y ago
That sounds like a very one-sided argument. If you want a functioning government you're going to need money to pay for it, and if you don't have sales tax it means you have to get it elsewhere; it doesn't "make it go awa
445.
by oneplane 3y ago
Because 'more and bigger' can be summed up as 'scaling'...
446.
by oneplane 3y ago
I suppose the linux kernel model has the benefit of having a mutual dependency so you can't really easily long-term extract value without adding value. (i.e. forking the kernel means you'll be spending a lot of time keeping up, so
447.
by oneplane 3y ago
Seems like we're in a period of ecosystems shooting themselves in the foot, be it 'social' media, software, banking or politics. I suppose, in a way, we have gotten accustomed to a relatively long period of stability. As for
448.
by oneplane 3y ago
I strongly depends on what you mean by 'control' and 'made'. In a sense it all depends on the depth of control and making your own; nearly all modern silicon requires proprietary software to initialise it to a usable sta
449.
by oneplane 3y ago
I wouldn't call a 4 to 6 rows of buttons before you get content a 'better UI'... It seems cluttered at best. Even the not-exactly-amazing Mac AppStore has a small partition for navigation and a large partition for content and
450.
by oneplane 3y ago
The entire article can be summed up the same way you can sum up bad security products: DevOps isn't something you buy or make a department out of, it's something you do, or better yet, it is a method. DevOps is fine, bad DevOps is

More ›