oneplane

57 ms·

451.
by oneplane 3y ago
It would probably not run on this potato directly, but on an accelerator (be it in-SoC or a separate thing like a Google Coral). The management and control of a Coral needs to happen on a CPU somewhere, but the actual work doesn't invo
452.
by oneplane 3y ago
I think that's only for ARM's own GPU IP, not for the VOP (it's more of a LCD driver than an actual GPU -- I'd compare the VOP to say, GameBoy-color level of graphics capabilities, which is cool but not even close to a b
453.
by oneplane 3y ago
No, it's DOA. Embeddable components need support too. As do OEMs and prototyping scenarios. It is presented as a viable commercial product, but it actually is an old SoC with no ecosystem. If anything, it teaches people not to use this
454.
by oneplane 3y ago
You're actually answering your own question here ;-) Because a SoC with limited CPU-core resources can't do everything in software, the chip contains many system components (hence System-on-Chip or System-on-a-Chip) that handle th
455.
by oneplane 3y ago
As usual, looks good on papier but no ecosystem and the current stack that it comes with is dead on arrival. Boards need to come with mainstream distro support or with an ecosystem (or both), otherwise it will just die. And with internet co
456.
by oneplane 3y ago
It's dead on arrival; currently runs Debian 10 with custom patches and binary blobs. It's an RK3308 so not entirely impossible to run on a normal distro, but you'd have to bring your own firmware and device tree etc.
457.
by oneplane 3y ago
I'd say more like some slimy poison frog, toxic, nasty and only care about themselves while smearing themselves all over the place. Looks great from a distance tho. Or, they are a self-aware trolley that eats run-over people after choo
458.
by oneplane 3y ago
> I don't care if That's the thing: they aren't building it just for you. We can speculate about their internal requirements documents, but what's for sure is that they calculate a projected market adoption based on v
459.
by oneplane 3y ago
I was thinking the same thing, just like TinyGo can target both microcontrollers and WASM.
460.
by oneplane 3y ago
What leads you to believe that people who do not want to work are desirable to have in the workplace? UBI also doesn't give you wealth, it gives you basics, and overal that's much cheaper than dragging down an entire team or depar
461.
by oneplane 3y ago
Same here. Employers can't even look inside user's mailboxes because there is no guarantee that it doesn't contain anything personal. Even if the company has a rule that you're not allowed to use it for personal things,
462.
by oneplane 3y ago
Yep, works in M2 in asahi linux, but I'm not sure Apple has it enabled in their framework.
463.
by oneplane 3y ago
Hardware RAID is pretty much a niche at this stage. And unreliable and unsafe in general. Using it is like having an open fire pit inside your home because it's nice and cozy, and assuming that your house not having burned down yet mea
464.
by oneplane 3y ago
I'm surprised after 14 replies you are still completely missing the point. This has nothing to do with 'windows bad' or 'app sandboxing bad' or 'haha desktop' some nonsense like that. (which is what you se
465.
by oneplane 3y ago
I'm not really interested in that dead-end avenue. Bulk usage is all browser based, most basic applications that do have a desktop-based client are essentially packaged chrome browsers, and high-performance apps are so custom and so ti
466.
by oneplane 3y ago
So from a developer perspective (in the OCI ecosystem), it's perhaps 10% new GUI stuff, and then 10% of what Docker does, and Docker doesn't even do its own stuff all that well. Unless someone really wants that GUI stuff (as in, p
467.
by oneplane 3y ago
So in essence it's getting no traction, it's just force-fed (which doesn't require traction) and only if you are targeting the windows store. This is the same pattern as they followed with all the other attempts Microsoft mad
468.
by oneplane 3y ago
But that's the problem, isn't it? It tries to be too much of an 'enterprise solution' instead of a developer-centric ship-your-stuff method. It's not getting traction, and it's not compatible with anything. It&
469.
by oneplane 3y ago
Ah, you are right. I thought it mostly relied on Hyper-V isolation (a bit like core isolation) and the process grouping was mostly a bonus inside the Hyper-V context, but apparently this works without Hyper-V as well so it would make sense
470.
by oneplane 3y ago
That's the problem, the Job API is not cgroups and cannot be used as cgroups. NT also had multiple personalities or subsystems before KVM or QEMU were even thought of, yet here we are, a useless feature with no traction and no ecosyste
471.
by oneplane 3y ago
I think they are getting bit by their wishes to make it both perfect and backwards compatible at the same time. Even a janky port of RPM or DPKG or OCI with cgroups would have been a better way to move forward. But because MS doesn't h
472.
by oneplane 3y ago
More like yet another half-assed attempt at cgroups. Not saying cgroups is chopped liver, but at least it has in broad use with lots of users, tools and experience over a long period of time. Microsoft has yet to come up with something even
473.
by oneplane 3y ago
Because not enough people with the skills or resources to do it care enough to do it. It's not really all that strange when you think about it; when printers started to become extra annoying people stayed on the well known ones and whe
474.
by oneplane 3y ago
I think there is yet another option we both didn't state, but an option that is also in use to this day. Some apps simply have multiple entries in the current AppStore model, and the version you currently have is very much separate fro
475.
by oneplane 3y ago
That technical method isn't the only way to implement this business method, and a number of existing apps are doing this quite successfully already. So this both already exists, and works. As for 'side loading', it's som
476.
by oneplane 3y ago
I think that it is where this project shines; the accessibility. After building and setting it up it can work stand-alone, but also integrated with any project you are already familiar with (within reason).
477.
by oneplane 3y ago
It's pretty cool. But note that from an end-user perspective you're getting a Flir Lepton 3.5 thermal camera for $522.99. A Flir TG165-X does mostly the same stuff for a much lower price (and half the horizontal and vertical resol
478.
by oneplane 3y ago
On a non-google level just being aware of code sitting around costing resources is pretty important. Often, tests and maintenance are just ignored or not calculated in as cost (be it time, money, effort or otherwise). It is almost in the sa
479.
by oneplane 3y ago
There are many ways to do this. Asterisk and a rented VoIP line, a hosted PBX service you just rent and transfer your line to, a 'Web 2.0' variation of the same (like Twilio), or even a programmable desk phone.
480.
by oneplane 3y ago
It doesn't have to be new, but adding more housing generally requires you to build buildings, and when a building is built where there used to be no building, it is generally referred to as new construction and thus new (or newly added

More ›