oldandtired

12 ms·

61.
by oldandtired 3y ago
> What do you mean? Whose intelligence programmed this system? > Do you remember the name of the AI? If I recall correctly - Go AI. They used a simple regular pattern and the system failed to beat the human. It didn't [learn] fro
62.
by oldandtired 3y ago
> You appear to be asserting that humans can tell if a loop will end, when that loop is defined so that if it does it doesn't and if it doesn't it does We can determine by looking at certain problems (The Halting Problem is one
63.
by oldandtired 3y ago
Your example of the Go AI being programmed to learn is not all that accurate for what has been achieved here. I didn't keep the link for the discussion on the confounding of the Go AI system. What the discussion covered though was that
64.
by oldandtired 3y ago
With your example of "Turing Complete", we know what cannot be done and in this way, we have enumerated the things that can be done, if you like. You appreciate the humour required for the up-arrow notation - a very human quality.
65.
by oldandtired 3y ago
Your definition of intelligence has been around for millennia and is part of the pantheism concept.
66.
by oldandtired 3y ago
You make a claim here with "Each answer displayed astonishing understanding of what occurs." and the question you fail to ask is: Whose understanding? The responses are based on the accumulated knowledge of humans and not machines
67.
by oldandtired 3y ago
The question to ask is why? The answer is that we have programmed these systems to do what we require. They cannot exceed but they fail becasue of errors that we have placed in these systems. All of the tasks that you have mentioned have be
68.
by oldandtired 3y ago
It is impossible to enumerate all the things that we humans do. However, we can enumerate all the things that we create can do. Every system we create has its limitation due to the limitations that we create in them. All systems we create c
69.
by oldandtired 3y ago
I don't know how many of you have looked at age estimates for both the universe and the earth over time. What to me is an interesting observation is that an age is calculated on "best" information at the time. Then comes alon
70.
by oldandtired 3y ago
Unfortunately, both shelf and snipe are limited asset management systems that do not cover the broader asset management situations and issues. Having worked in asset management at one time, the field has some quite difficult aspects that ar
71.
by oldandtired 3y ago
Of the list given in the article, as a Dad and Granddad, I didn't find them as [Dad Jokes]. Mayhaps it is because I am an Australian Native. I have found that here, you have to have either a foil (your children, grandchildren or your w
72.
by oldandtired 3y ago
The language classifications section was an attempt at humour. I am currently trying to [understand] the quirky translation of ScratchPad to Common Lisp used within the Axiom/FriCAS systems. You see the same sort of problems in Maxima
73.
by oldandtired 3y ago
Oh dear, the language classifications above was supposed to be a somewhat obtuse sort of joke and it appears that I was way too obtuse with the grouping for [COBOL style languages] and the [a couple of other more minor kinds]. Way too many
74.
by oldandtired 3y ago
Before you start down this path, which will take longer than you imagine, you need to understand your underlying reasons for doing so. What is your problem domain? What don't you like about the currently available languages? Why do you
75.
by oldandtired 3y ago
A couple of decades ago, I was being interviewed for a position as the support developer. The interviewer asked me to tell what a piece of code was meant to do. I responded by by telling him that without context, the code was quite unclear.
76.
by oldandtired 3y ago
You ask a very pointed question and after reading the various responses given, I think it is quite obvious that many have forgotten a very simple rule from decades ago: Garbage In -> Garbage Out. Two things to consider: 1). No computer s
77.
by oldandtired 4y ago
Even if you have fenced in and dedicated roads, there are system control problems that will always arise. The more vehicles the greater the opportunity for failure of the system. Even today, simple systems like automated industrial plants h
78.
by oldandtired 4y ago
The question to ask is whether or not any algorithmic system is capable of exceeding the programming on which it is based. This question applies to every kind of system we have developed over the years. The other point to make is that we al
79.
by oldandtired 4y ago
Artificial stupidity (AI) is still stupidity. If you want to deal with people (in any circumstance) don't depend on computer systems to give advice as these systems have no comprehension at all, let alone any intelligence.
80.
by oldandtired 4y ago
No, as I found out in a recent problem myself. Cancellation of the card is a necessary part of the process.
81.
by oldandtired 4y ago
Speak to your bank and as [superchroma] has suggested cancel your credit card and fully aprise your bank of what has happened. Document everything, get all documents certified by a court or JP (if that is available in your particular area)
82.
by oldandtired 4y ago
After reading various comments by all sorts here, it is obvious that many do not know history nor do they understand the consequences of decisions made in the past that are now coming home to roost. Those decisions being approved by whateve
83.
by oldandtired 4y ago
If Australians wrote the language in the manner in which we speak, no-one would comprehend what we have written. There is an old book demonstrating this called "Let Stalk Strine"/"Nose Tone Unturned" by the author A
84.
by oldandtired 4y ago
You make a claim that [They do learn from much deeper low level structures in the domain they are exposed to] and yet what we see is not learning. All such systems are constrained by the programming that goes into them. As such, these syste
85.
by oldandtired 4y ago
The CMB is far less uniform than it should be. From an observational POV, we can see light coming to us from all directions radially towards us. We treat the speed as an essentially constant value, even though we know this is false in reali
86.
by oldandtired 4y ago
What I was commenting on was your categorical claim that the selected portion of the original comment was false and you have not provided that mathematical "proof". As for a single counter example, you need to demonstrate that the
87.
by oldandtired 4y ago
The CMB is assumed to be what it is stated to be. If you look at the various theoretical predictions for the CMB, you will see that the theoretical predictions have been quite inaccurate. In absolute magnitude, the temperature that would be
88.
by oldandtired 4y ago
Mathematics is a simplification methodology and doesn't necessarily match what actually exists. So to say that the original comment is "false" means that you have to "prove" that it is false in the sense of the logi
89.
by oldandtired 4y ago
Not at all. You are applying an assumption for which you cannot actually determine is true or false. That assumption is that we could measure the differences because we would see a "linear" flow (using the word linear is the sense
90.
by oldandtired 4y ago
If you shine a light on a detector, you measure the time it takes to travel both legs. What is being said is that all we can know is the average time from when it leaves us to when it gets back to us (i.e. the sensor results). It could well

More ›